盘龙刺配合背部走罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征疗效观察

目的:比较盘龙刺配合背部走罐与西药泼尼松治疗慢性疲劳综合征的疗效差异。方法:将72例患者随机分为针罐组(37例)和泼尼松组(35例)。针罐组穴取T1—L5夹脊穴,运用盘龙刺法(每天1次)结合背部走罐(隔2日1次)治疗,泼尼松组口服泼尼松片10mg,每天早晨8:00顿服。7天为一疗程,共治疗2个疗程。治疗前后采用疲劳量表-14(FS-14)评分和BELL氏慢性疲劳综合征积分表评定患者疲劳程度,比较两组疗效。结果:治疗1个疗程后,两组BELL氏积分较治疗前明显改善(均P<0.01),但组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗2个疗程后针罐组BELL氏积分较泼尼松组改善明显(P<0.05);针罐组总有效率为91.9%(34/37),优于泼尼松组的71.4%(25/35,P<0.05)。结论:盘龙刺配合背部走罐治疗慢性疲劳综合征疗效肯定,优于口服泼尼松。

Observation on therapeutic effect of chronic fatigue syndrome treated with coiling dragon needling and moving cupping on back

Objective To compare the differences of therapeutic effect of chronic fatigue syndrome treated with the combined therapy of coiling dragon needling and cupping on back and the western medicine therapy with Prednisone.Methods Seventy-two cases were randomly divided into an acupuncture and cupping group(37 cases) and a Prednisone group(35 cases).In acupuncture and cupping group,Jiaji(EX-B 2) points of T1-L5 were applied with coiling dragon needling(once a day),combined with moving cupping on back(once every two days);in Prednisone group,Prednisone tablets were orally taken for 10 mg at 8:00 am.Seven days made one course,and 2 courses were carried on totally.FS-14 scale and BELL’s chronic fatigue syndrome integral table were applied to eva-luate the fatigue degree of patients before and after treatment,and the therapeutic effects of both groups were compared.Results After one course of treatment,the BELL’s scores of both groups were obviously improved(both P<0.01),but there was no significant difference between groups(P>0.05);after two courses of treatment,the BELL’s score in acupuncture and cupping group improved more obviously than that in Prednisone group,and the total effective rate of 91.9%(34/37) in acupuncture and cupping group was superior to that of 71.4%(25/35) in Prednisone group(P<0.05).Conclusion The therapeutic effect of chronic fatigue syndrome treated with coiling dragon needling and moving cupping on back is positive,superior to that of Prednisone with oral administration.