首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

固相微萃取与超临界流体萃取艾叶挥发油的GC-MS对比分析
引用本文:郝鹏飞,张瓅方,张超云,黄显章.固相微萃取与超临界流体萃取艾叶挥发油的GC-MS对比分析[J].中国实验方剂学杂志,2014,20(23):68-71.
作者姓名:郝鹏飞  张瓅方  张超云  黄显章
作者单位:南阳理工学院, 河南 南阳 473000;南阳理工学院, 河南 南阳 473000;南阳理工学院, 河南 南阳 473000;南阳理工学院, 河南 南阳 473000
基金项目:河南省重点科技攻关项目(112102310349);南阳理工学院青年基金项目(NG2013QNJJ05)
摘    要:目的: 探讨固相微萃取(SPME)与超临界流体萃取(SFE)所得南阳艾叶挥发油成分的不同,确定其主含成分及含量,并对其进行分析. 方法: 分别以SPME与SFE提取艾叶挥发油并以GC-MS进行对比分析. 结果: 以SPME法得到了38种化合物,SFE 得到了26种化合物,GC-MS分析分别占其总量的95.17%和95.26%;通过对比质谱数据库(NIST,NBS)进行鉴别,前者鉴别出35个组分,后者鉴别出25个;各组分含量均不相同,但最高者均为1,8-桉树脑(分别为13.75%,18.26%),其他在SPME中依次为2-莰醇(11.58%)、异蒿属(甲)酮(7.15%)及对称二甲基脲(5.12%);在SFE中依次为异蒿属(甲)酮(12.15%),2-莰醇(11.38%)及反-罗勒烯(7.03%). 结论: SPME萃取与SFE萃取所得的艾叶挥发油成分差异较大,相较而言SPME具有较明显的优越性.

关 键 词:固相微萃取  超临界流体  艾叶  气相色谱-质谱联用
收稿时间:2014/2/27 0:00:00

Comparative Analysis GC-MS of Artemisiae Argyi Folium Volatile Oil Extracted by SPME and SFE
HAO Peng-fei,ZHANG Li-fang,ZHANG Chao-yun and HUANG Xian-zhang.Comparative Analysis GC-MS of Artemisiae Argyi Folium Volatile Oil Extracted by SPME and SFE[J].China Journal of Experimental Traditional Medical Formulae,2014,20(23):68-71.
Authors:HAO Peng-fei  ZHANG Li-fang  ZHANG Chao-yun and HUANG Xian-zhang
Institution:Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473000, China;Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473000, China;Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473000, China;Nanyang Institute of Technology, Nanyang 473000, China
Abstract:Objective: The aim of this study was to analyze the ingredients, and to identify the main ingredients and content of the volatile oil,which extracted from Nanyang Artemisiae Argyi Folium volatile oil by two different solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and supercritical fluid extraction (SFE). Method: The volatile oil was extracted separately from Artemisiae Argyi Folium by SPME and SFE. Then GG-MS was used to analyze it. Result: Thirty-eight components were isolated by SPEM, accounting for 95.17% of the total content,Thirty-five components were with 35 identified by comparing with the mass spectrometry database, while 26 components were isolated by SFE, accounting for 95.26% of the total content, with 25 identified by comparing with the mass spectrometry database. The content of each component varied,with eucaylptole as the most (13.75% and 18.26% respectively). The following components isolated from SPME were including borneol (11.58%), isoartemisia ketone (7.15%) and esym-dimethylurea (5.12%);the following components from SFE included isoartemisia ketone (12.15%), borneol (11.38%) and trans-ocimene (7.03%). Conclusion: The result verified the superiority of the SPME method, though the components of the volatile oil extracted by two different ways are obviously different.
Keywords:solid-phase microextraction  supercritical fluid extraction  Artemisiae Argyi Folium  GC-MS
点击此处可从《中国实验方剂学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国实验方剂学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号