首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

米索前列醇片不同给药途径的人体药动学研究
引用本文:吴高蕾,裴开颜,陈笑艳,张逸凡,钟大放,贾孟春.米索前列醇片不同给药途径的人体药动学研究[J].中国药学杂志,2010,45(1):52-55.
作者姓名:吴高蕾  裴开颜  陈笑艳  张逸凡  钟大放  贾孟春
作者单位:中国科学院上海药物研究所;国家人口计生委科学技术研究所;
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划课题(课题编号2006BAI03B10)
摘    要: 目的 比较米索前列醇不同给药途径(口服、舌下和阴道)药动学特征。方法 采用平行试验设计,30名中国健康女性志愿受试者随机分为3组,分别空腹口服、舌下含服和阴道给予400 μg米索前列醇片,采用液相色谱-串联质谱法测定受试者血浆中米索前列醇活性代谢物米索前列酸的浓度。结果 受试者空腹口服、舌下含服和阴道给药后的主要药动学参数:tmax分别为(0.18±0.05),(0.40 ± 0.14)和(5.05±1.80)h,ρmax 分别为(1 424±380),(783±285)和(302±198) ng·L-1,t1/2分别为(0.61±0.32),(0.82±0.18)和(5.27±4.38)h,AUC0-t分别为(698±138),(824±302)和(1 313±691)ng·h·L-1,AUC0-∞分别为(709±143),(846±306)和(1 816±727)ng·h·L-1。结论 米索前列醇片经不同途径给药后的药动学有较大差异。空腹口服给药后吸收迅速,米索前列酸达峰最快,舌下含服给药tmax略有延长,阴道给药tmax明显滞后。达峰浓度以空腹口服给药最高,舌下含服次之,阴道给药最低。与空腹口服和舌下含服相比,阴道给药AUC最高,但个体差异较大。

关 键 词:米索前列醇  给药途径  液相色谱-串联质谱法  药动学
收稿时间:2012-01-01;

Pharmacokinetic Studies of Misoprostol Tablet Following Oral,Sublingual and Vaginal Administration in Female Volunteers
WU Gao-lei,PEI Kai-yan,CHEN Xiao-yan,ZHANG Yi-fan,ZHONG Da-fang,JIA Meng-chun.Pharmacokinetic Studies of Misoprostol Tablet Following Oral,Sublingual and Vaginal Administration in Female Volunteers[J].Chinese Pharmaceutical Journal,2010,45(1):52-55.
Authors:WU Gao-lei  PEI Kai-yan  CHEN Xiao-yan  ZHANG Yi-fan  ZHONG Da-fang  JIA Meng-chun
Institution:WU Gao-lei1,PEI Kai-yan2,CHEN Xiao-yan1,ZHANG Yi-fan1,ZHONG Da-fang1,JIA Meng-chun2*(1.Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Shanghai 201203,China,2.National Research Institute for Family Planning,Beijing 100081,China)
Abstract:OBJECTIVE To compare the pharmacokinetic profiles of orally, sublingually, and vaginally administered misoprostol tablets in Chinese healthy female volunteers. METHODS A total of 30 women were randomized to receive 400 μg of misoprostol by one of three routes(i) oral (ii) sublingual (iii) vaginal. The major active metabolite of misoprostol acid was determined in plasma using a liquid chromatographic-tandem mass spectrometric method. RESULTS The main pharmacokinetic parameters of misoprostol acid administered by oral, sublingual and vaginal routes were as followstmax (0.18±0.05), (0.40±0.14) and (5.05±1.80) h, ρmax (1 424±380), (783±285) and (302±198) ng·L-1, t1/2 (0.61±0.32), (0.82±0.18) and (5.27±4.38) h, AUC0-t (698±138), (824±302) and (1 313±691) ng·h·L-1, AUC0-∞ (709±143), (846±306) and (1 816±727) ng·h·L-1, respectively. CONCLUSION There are significant differences in the pharmacokinetics of misoprostol administered by oral, vaginal and sublingual routes. Oral misoprostol had a higher peak plasma concentration of misoprostol acid and a shorter duration to maximum concentration than either sublingual or vaginal misoprostol. ρmax obtained after vaginal administration is the lowest, but the AUC is significantly higher than those in the oral and sublingual groups. However, there was a wide individual variability in the vaginal group.
Keywords:misoprostol  administration route  liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry  pharmacokinetics  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国药学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国药学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号