首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

针刺治疗坐骨神经痛的文献质量评价
引用本文:邱学梅,魏凌波,陈少宗.针刺治疗坐骨神经痛的文献质量评价[J].山东中医杂志,2014(3):195-196.
作者姓名:邱学梅  魏凌波  陈少宗
作者单位:[1]山东中医药大学2011年级硕士研究生,山东济南250355 [2]山东省中医药研究院针灸研究所,山东济南250014
摘    要:目的:对针刺治疗坐骨神经痛的临床文献进行质量评价。方法:通过电子检索万方数据库获得所有涉及针刺治疗坐骨神经痛的临床文献,选择符合纳入标准的文献,评价其方法。结果:在纳入的187篇文献中,其中随机对照文献仅占24.60%,对46篇随机对照文献进行分析:仅有10.87%的文献对随机分组的方法进行了描述,67.39%的文献对组间均衡性进行了描述,56.52%的文献明确诊断标准。结论:针刺治疗坐骨神经痛的文献质量还需要提高。

关 键 词:针刺  坐骨神经痛  文献质量评价

Evaluation of the Quality of Literature on Acupuncture for Sciatica
QIU Xuemei,WEI. Lingbo,CHEN Shaozong.Evaluation of the Quality of Literature on Acupuncture for Sciatica[J].Shandong Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine,2014(3):195-196.
Authors:QIU Xuemei  WEI Lingbo  CHEN Shaozong
Institution:1.Postgraduate of 2011 Grade of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250355,China; 2.Acupuncture Research Institute of Shandong Academy of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Jinan 250014,China)
Abstract:Objective :We aimed to evaluate the quality of clinical literatures on acupuncture in the treatment of facial sciatica. Methods:By electronic Wanfang database,we access to all clinical literatures about acupuncture in the treatment of sciatica,choose the standard literatures and evaluate the method. Results :In the 187 standard literatures,the randomly controlled literature accounted for only 24.60%,we carry on the analysis to the 46 randomly control literatures,the results are as follows:only 10.87% literatures describe random packet,67.39% literature describes the equilibrium between the groups,56.52% clinical literature clarify diagnostic criteria. Conclusion:The quality of literatures on acupuncture for sciatica need be improved.
Keywords:acupuncture  sciatica  literature evaluation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号