首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

厚朴总酚固体分散体不同制备方法的比较研究
引用本文:李杰,狄留庆,李俊松,康安,钱静,王灯节.厚朴总酚固体分散体不同制备方法的比较研究[J].中国中药杂志,2015,40(22):4400-4405.
作者姓名:李杰  狄留庆  李俊松  康安  钱静  王灯节
作者单位:南京中医药大学药学院, 江苏南京 210023;江苏省中药高效给药系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏南京 210023,南京中医药大学药学院, 江苏南京 210023;江苏省中药高效给药系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏南京 210023,南京中医药大学药学院, 江苏南京 210023;江苏省中药高效给药系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏南京 210023,南京中医药大学药学院, 江苏南京 210023;江苏省中药高效给药系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏南京 210023,南京中医药大学药学院, 江苏南京 210023;江苏省中药高效给药系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏南京 210023,南京中医药大学药学院, 江苏南京 210023;江苏省中药高效给药系统工程技术研究中心, 江苏南京 210023
基金项目:江苏省"333高层次人才培养工程"项目(BRA2013201);江苏高校优势学科建设工程项目(ysxk-2010)
摘    要:比较研究厚朴总酚固体分散体不同制备方法之间的差异。分别使用热熔挤出法、溶剂蒸发法、熔融冷却法制备厚朴总酚Plastone S-630及HPC 2种辅料固体分散体。采用DSC,X-射线衍射评价所制备固体分散体中药物的分散状态;通过FT-IR分析药物与辅料之间可能存在的连接方式;最后通过加速稳定性-溶出试验比较3种工艺的稳定性差异。DSC及X-射线衍射结果显示3种工艺制备的固体分散体中药物均能以无定形态存在;FT-IR结果也无法区别3种工艺间的差异;加速稳定性-溶出试验表明HPC所制备的固体分散体稳定性明显优于Plastone S-630,同种辅料间热熔挤出技术制备的固体分散体稳定性要好于其他2种工艺。

关 键 词:厚朴总酚  热熔挤出  溶剂蒸发  熔融冷却  工艺比较
收稿时间:2015/6/18 0:00:00

Comparison of total phenol of magnolia solid dispersion prepared by different methods
LI Jie,DI Liu-qing,LI Jun-song,KANG An,QIAN Jing and WANG Deng-jie.Comparison of total phenol of magnolia solid dispersion prepared by different methods[J].China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica,2015,40(22):4400-4405.
Authors:LI Jie  DI Liu-qing  LI Jun-song  KANG An  QIAN Jing and WANG Deng-jie
Institution:Pharmacy College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,Pharmacy College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,Pharmacy College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,Pharmacy College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China,Pharmacy College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China and Pharmacy College, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China;Jiangsu Engineering Research Center for Efficient Delivery System of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China
Abstract:To compare the difference of total phenol of magnolia solid dispersion prepared by different methods. Hot melt extrusion, solvent evaporation method, and fusion-cooling method were used to prepare total phenol of Magnolia accessory solid dispersion, Plastone S-630 and HPC. The drug dispersion state in the prepared solid dispersion was evaluated with DSC and X-ray diffraction; FT-IR method was used to analyze the possible connections between drug and accessories. Finally, accelerated stability-in vivo dissolution test was use to compare the stability differences between these three processes. The results of DSC and X-ray diffraction showed that all of the drug in solid dispersion processed by three processes can exist in amorphous form; FT-IR results also could not distinguish the difference between the three processes; accelerated stability-in vivo dissolution test showed the stability of solid dispersion prepared by HPC was better than Plastone S-630, and the same kinds of materials solid dispersion prepared by hot melt extrusion showed a better stability than the other two processes.
Keywords:total phenol of magnolia  hot melt extrusion  solvent evaporation  fusion-cooling  process comparison
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号