国内发表的中药相关系统评价的方法学质量评价 |
| |
引用本文: | 吴宇侠,王家良,康德英,胡丹.国内发表的中药相关系统评价的方法学质量评价[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2011,31(3):402-406. |
| |
作者姓名: | 吴宇侠 王家良 康德英 胡丹 |
| |
作者单位: | 1. 四川省自贡市第三人民医院,四川,自贡,643020 2. 四川大学华西医院循证医学与临床流行病学教研室,成都,610041 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家中医药管理局资助项目 |
| |
摘 要: | 目的 探讨两种方法学质量评价工具对中药相关系统评价的适用性,进而评价国内发表的中药相关系统评价/Meta分析的方法学质量。
|
关 键 词: | 中医药 系统评价 Meta分析 方法学 质量评价 |
Methodological Quality Assessment of Systematic Reviews Correlated to Traditional Chinese Medicine Published in China |
| |
Authors: | WU Yu-xi KANG De-ying and HU Dan |
| |
Institution: | HU Dan,KANG De-ying,WU Yu-xia,et al Department of Evidence-Based Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology,West China Hospital,Sichuan University,Chengdu(610041) |
| |
Abstract: | Objective To assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews or Meta-analysis of traditional Chinese medicine published in China,and to validate the applicability of OQAQ(Overview Quality Assessment Questionnaire) and AMSTAR(a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews) in traditional Chinese medicine(Chinese Medical).Methods Comprehensive literature retrieve was performed in CBM,CNKI,VIP as well as hand searching in Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine.The retrieve was started from January 1,1999 and terminated by December 2008.The methodological quality of traditional Chinese medicine correlated systematic reviews was evaluated using OQAQ and AMSTAR simultaneously.Results A total of 115 systematic reviews involved 17 types of diseases,of which,the cardio-/cerebrovascular diseases was dominant(36 papers,31.30%).The mean OQAQ score was 2.50(95% CI:2.22,2.76).No significant correlation was found in OQAQ score with publication year(P=0.35) and different disease types(P=0.28).High consistency was observed in evaluations of systematic reviews by using OQAQ and AMSTAR(both Kappa values0.75).Compared with the OQAQ,AMSTAR incorporated 3 additional items:the topics,publication bias,and conflict of interest,etc.Although 98.26% of systematic reviews proposed protocols in prior,53.04% failed to analyze the publication bias.Besides,57.39% neglected to address the potential conflict of interest.Conclusions Poor methodological quality in systematic reviews of Chinese Medical published in China needs to be improved and emphasized.It is necessary to integrate the special characteristics of traditional Chinese medicine itself when choosing topics of systematic reviews.It is essential to establish quality assessment tools targeting systematic reviews of traditional Chinese medicine. |
| |
Keywords: | traditional Chinese medicine systematic review Meta-analysis methodology quality assessment |
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
| 点击此处可从《中国中西医结合杂志》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《中国中西医结合杂志》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|