拔罐疗法结合针刺治疗面瘫急性期耳后疼痛33例

目的观察拔罐疗法结合针刺治疗面瘫耳后疼痛的临床疗效。方法将60例患者按随机数字表分为2组,试验组33例,对照组27例。试验组:针刺治疗后,取阳白、地仓、颊车、颧髎、翳风、完骨,依次闪罐,至皮肤局部潮红为度,然后在翳风、完骨留罐约3~5分钟。对照组:单纯采用针刺治疗。治疗1周后,均只行电针治疗。结果试验组和对照组治疗时间分别为(18.90±3.82)d、(22.78±3.85)d,两组在治疗时间方面差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。试验组治愈20例,显效7例,有效6例,无效0例;对照组治愈15例,显效5例,有效7例,无效0例。试验组治愈率及显效率均高于对照组,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论拔罐配合针刺治疗面瘫耳后疼痛临床疗效显著,治疗时间、治愈率均优于对照组,可予以临床推广。

Cupping Therapy combined with Acupuncture in the Treatment of Acute Facial Paralysis Patients with Peri-auricular Pain for 33 Cases

Objective To observe the clinical effect of cupping therapy combined with acupuncture in the treatment of acute facial paralysis patients with peri-auricular pain.Methods According to random number table , sixty outpatients with acute facial paralysis and peri-auricular pain were divided into two groups .The treatment group had 33 cases, and the control group had 27 cases.In the treatment group, after acupuncture, flash cupping GB14, ST4, ST6, SI18, SJ17, GB12, until the skin is flushing, then retention cupping 3-5minutes at SJ17 and GB12.In the control group , patients received only the treatment of acupuncture .After 1week, the two groups both used electronic acupuncture instead of the other therapy .Results After treatment, the course of the treatment group and the control group was 18.90 ±3. 82d and 22.78 ±3.85d, respectively.The course of treatment between the two groups had significant difference by comparison (P<0.05). In the treatment group , 20 cases were cured , 7 cases improved , 5 cases were effective , and 0 case were ineffective .In the control group , 15 cases were cured, 5 cases improved, 7 cases were effective, and 0 case were ineffective.The cure rate and the recovery rate of the treatment group were higher than that of the control group , respectively , but had no significant difference by comparison ( P>0.05 ) .Conclusion The acupuncture and cupping therapy in the treatment of facial paralysis patients with peri -auricular had a good clinical effect , the treatment time and the cure rate were better than those of the control group , and it can be clinical promotion .