首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

瓣叶切除与人工腱索治疗单纯二尖瓣后叶脱垂的病例对照研究
引用本文:仲肇基,岳子祺,赵振华,杨腾蛟,朱家德,宋武,刘盛.瓣叶切除与人工腱索治疗单纯二尖瓣后叶脱垂的病例对照研究[J].中国心血管病研究杂志,2019,17(7).
作者姓名:仲肇基  岳子祺  赵振华  杨腾蛟  朱家德  宋武  刘盛
作者单位:中国医学科学院阜外医院,中国医学科学院阜外医院 ,心外科,中国医学科学院阜外医院,中国医学科学院阜外医院 心外科,中国医学科学院阜外医院 成人心外科,中国医学科学院阜外医院,中国医学科学院阜外医院
基金项目:首都临床特色应用研究与推广(项目编号:Z151100004015107);北京协和医学院“协和青年基金”(项目编号:3332015105)
摘    要:目的 比较单纯二尖瓣后叶脱垂应用瓣叶切除或人工腱索技术行二尖瓣成形术的手术效果。 方法 2010年12月至2013年12月, 384例患者病因单纯二尖瓣后叶脱垂导致的二尖瓣反流于我科行二尖瓣成形术,其中单纯人工腱索者33例(8.6%)、单纯瓣叶切除者258例(67.2%)。应用倾向评分匹配进行配对,分为人工腱索组(n=32)与瓣叶切除组(n=32),并进行比较。回顾性分析两组围手术期情况及术后随访结果。结果 倾向评分匹配后人工腱索组和瓣叶切除组的各项术前指标无统计学差异。两组均顺利完成手术,无围手术期死亡。两组体外循环时间、主动脉阻断时间均有统计学差异(P=0.009、0.013)。人工腱索组使用较大二尖瓣成形环更多(P=0.019)。两组出院前左室射血分数(LVEF)、舒张期二尖瓣跨瓣峰值压差(TMG)均无统计学差异。平均随访(31.8±11.9)个月,两组患者生存、再次手术、≥中度二尖瓣反流、舒张期二尖瓣跨瓣峰值压差、再次手术均无统计学差异,但人工腱索组LVEF为(66.0±4.1)%,瓣叶切除组LVEF为(61.5±5.9)%,两组间有统计学差异(P=0.007)。 结论 人工腱索技术和瓣叶切除技术都可以有效地修复二尖瓣后叶脱垂。人工腱索技术与瓣叶切除技术相比更有利于术后左室功能,但两种技术在术后生存及二尖瓣反流情况上并无差异。

关 键 词:二尖瓣反流  后叶脱垂  二尖瓣成形术  人工腱索  瓣叶切除
收稿时间:2019/1/15 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/5/30 0:00:00

Artificial chordae versus leaflet resection for isolated posterior mitral valve prolapse: a propensity score matched study
Yue Ziqi,Zhao Zhenhu,Yang Tengjiao,Zhu Jiade,Song Wu and Liu Sheng.Artificial chordae versus leaflet resection for isolated posterior mitral valve prolapse: a propensity score matched study[J].Chinese Journal of Cardiovascular Review,2019,17(7).
Authors:Yue Ziqi  Zhao Zhenhu  Yang Tengjiao  Zhu Jiade  Song Wu and Liu Sheng
Institution:Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science,Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Science
Abstract:Objective To compare outcomes of artificial chordae versus leaflet resection techniques for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. Methods From Dec. 2010 to Dec. 2013, a total of 384 mitral valve repairs for isolated posterior leaflet were carried out at our hospital. Of these patients, 33 cases underwent isolated artificial chordae replacement and 258 cases underwent isolated leaflet resection. The propensity score was used to create matched artificial chordae (n = 32) and leaflet resection (n = 32) cohorts. Results There were no significant differences in the preoperative profiles after propensity score matching. There was no peri-operative mortality. The cardiopulmonary bypass time and cross-clamp time was significantly different between the 2 groups (P=0.009 & 0.013, respectively). More large-size annuloplasty ring were used (P=0.019) in the artificial chordae group, but there was no significant in peak transmitral gradient (TMG). There was no significant difference in mortality, re-operation or recurrent mitral regurgitation during follow-up of (31.8±11.9) months. At the last echocardiography, the peak TMG was similar while the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was significantly different (P=0.007) between the 2 groups. Conclusion We demonstrated good midterm results for both artificial chordae and leaflet resection techniques for repair of isolated posterior mitral leaflet prolapse. No significant difference was found in mortality, re-operation or recurrent mitral regurgitation during mid-term follow-up, although in the artificial chordae technique result in better LVEF.
Keywords:Mitral regurgitation  Posterior leaflet prolapse  Mitral valve repair  Artificial chordae  Leaflet resection
点击此处可从《中国心血管病研究杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国心血管病研究杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号