Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in evaluation of tuberculous tubo ovarian mass

ObjectiveRole of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in diagnosis of tuberculous tubo-ovarian (TO) mass.MethodsMRI was performed on 33 patients of tuberculous TO mass of female genital tuberculosis (FGTB).ResultsMean age, BMI, and parity was 27.5 ± 4.2 years, 22.7 ± 3.6 kg/m², and 0.27 ± 0.13. All patients (100%) had infertility; primary infertility (72.72%) and secondary infertility (27.23%) with mean 5.8 years. Abdominal/pelvic pain 33 (100%) cases, abdominal lump 4 (12.12%), adnexal mass 33 (100%). MRI findings showed pelvic masses 33 (100%), bilateral TO masses 11 (33.33%), cystic lesion 4 (12.12%), solid cystic lesion 3 (9.09%) with bilateral pyosalpinx 1 (3.3%), homogeneous content with ascites 1 (3.03%), rim enhancing lesion abutting pelvic wall in 1 (3.03%). Right adnexal mass 11 (33.33%), right adnexal cyst 2 (6.06%), right adnexal cystic mass in 1 (3.03%), right sided complex TO mass 1 (3.03%), right sided hydrosalpinx in 1 (3.03%) case, right sided TO mass in 4 (12.12%) cases and right sided para-ovarian cyst in 2 (6.06%). Left sided adnexal mass was seen in 11 (33.33%), cystic lesion in 1 (3.03%), ovarian cyst in 3 (9.09%) cases, left sided hydrosalpinx in 2 (6.06%), left ovarian cyst 2 (6.06%) cases, left sided ovarian cyst with encysted ascites 1 (3.03%) case and with left sided paraovarian cyst 2 (6.06%) case. Miscellaneous finding were generalised ascites (6.06%), encysted ascites (3.03%), pelvic (1; 3.03%) and mesenteric lymphadenopathy 1 (3.03%). Incidental finding were fibroid 3 (9.09%) and adenomyosis 1 (3.03%) case.ConclusionMRI appears to be useful diagnostic modality for tuberculous TO masses where differential diagnosis is malignancy but molecular diagnosis remains the gold standard.