首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

公立医院法人治理结构改革初探——以北京市门头沟区医院为例
引用本文:马晓静,杨肖光,陈瑶,代涛.公立医院法人治理结构改革初探——以北京市门头沟区医院为例[J].中国卫生政策研究,2013,6(8):27-31.
作者姓名:马晓静  杨肖光  陈瑶  代涛
作者单位:中国医学科学院医学信息研究所/卫生政策与管理研究中心;中国医学科学院医学信息研究所/卫生政策与管理研究中心;中国医学科学院医学信息研究所/卫生政策与管理研究中心;中国医学科学院医学信息研究所/卫生政策与管理研究中心
基金项目:中澳卫生与艾滋病项目“深化医药卫生体制改革评价研究”;中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费“深化医药卫生体制改革监测与评价研究”
摘    要:目的:分析公立医院引入民营化管理对改善公立医院法人治理结构和绩效变化情况,并提出相关政策建议。方法:采用案例研究方法,通过焦点组访谈、个人深度访谈、问卷调查等,分析北京市门头沟区医院改革的做法与效果。结果:门头沟区医院2010年引入社会资本后法人治理结构得以优化,主要包括:建立医院法人治理结构,建立政府、监事会、第三方评估的多元监管体系和医院绩效考核指标体系,实施医院内部综合绩效考核制度,建立多元化投入机制等。结论与建议:改革后,医院在决策权、市场准入程度、问责机制、剩余索取权、社会功能等方面均发生改变,取得了初步效益,但也面临着一定的体制约束。公立医院治理机制改革需要创造良好的外部政策环境,进一步优化内部管理机制与考核制度,并注意在引入社会资本过程中保证提供服务的公益性。

关 键 词:公立医院改革  治理机制  民营化管理
收稿时间:7/5/2013 12:00:00 AM
修稿时间:8/1/2013 12:00:00 AM

The reform of corporate governance structure of public hospitals: A case study of Mentougou District Hospital in Beijing
MA Xiao-jing,YANG Xiao-guang,CHEN Yao,DAI Tao.The reform of corporate governance structure of public hospitals: A case study of Mentougou District Hospital in Beijing[J].Chinese Journal of Health Policy,2013,6(8):27-31.
Authors:MA Xiao-jing  YANG Xiao-guang  CHEN Yao  DAI Tao
Institution:Institute of Medical Information, Center for Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100020, China
Abstract:Objectives: To analyze the reform of corporate governance structure of public hospitals after the introduction of the privatization management of Mentougou District Hospital in Beijing. We observed changes in the organizations performance, and made several proposals. Methods: We analyzed the background, process, and effects of the reform in Mentougou District Hospital. The data sources included in depth interview, focus group discussion and questionnaires. Results: The main approaches of the reform included establishing a corporate governance structure, establishing multiple regulatory systems and public hospital performance evaluation indicators, and establishing a supervisory board and third party assessment. A comprehensive performance appraisal system and diversified investment mechanism were also established. Conclusion: Through reform, hospital decision making power, market entry, accountability mechanisms, residual claims, and social functions have changed and achieved some positive results. However, reform has also been hampered by certain institutional constraints. The reform of public hospital governance mechanisms need a favorable external institutional and policy environment and internal management mechanism and evaluation systems need to be optimized. Particular emphasis need to be placed on introducing social capital to ensure public welfare.
Keywords:Public hospital reform  Governance mechanism  Privatization management
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号