基于层次分析法-熵权法的一流科技期刊编辑职业素质评价指标体系研究

【目的】为建构更加科学的一流科技期刊编辑职业素质评价指标体系提供新方法。【方法】在采用文献分析法、专家访谈法确定一流科技期刊编辑职业素质结构的基础上,创新性地引入层次分析法-熵权法计算各指标的复合权重。【结果】经过总结分析确定心理素质、品格素质和专业素质3个一级指标,认知能力、个性特质、适应性能力、价值观、态度、专业知识和专业技能7个二级指标以及洞察力、责任心、政治素养、敬业精神等28个三级指标。根据复合权重值排序得出:价值观和态度是一流科技期刊编辑职业素质的核心指标;专业知识和专业技能是一流科技期刊编辑职业素质的基础指标;心理素质是一流科技期刊编辑职业素质不可忽视的关键指标。【结论】该评价指标体系覆盖范围更广,指标权重计算方法更加科学,能为相关部门制定规范的一流科技期刊编辑职业素质评价体系提供基础数据和理论方法指导,并为建设世界一流科技期刊在编辑人才职业素质的评定、人才的选拔、人才的培养和考核等方面提供一定的参考。

Evaluation index system of professional quality for first-class scientific journals editors based on analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method

Purposes] This paper is to offer a new method to construct a more scientific evaluation index system of professional quality for first-class scientific journals editors. Methods] On the basis of literature analysis and expert interview to determine the professional quality structure of first-class scientific journal editors, the analytic hierarchy process and entropy weight method were creatively introduced to calculate the composite weight of each index. Findings] According to the summary and analysis, we determine three primary indicators—psychological quality, character quality, and professional attributes, seven secondary indicators—cognitive ability, personality traits, adaptability, values, attitude, professional knowledge, and professional skills, and 28 tertiary indicators—insight, responsibility, political literacy, professionalism, etc. According to the compound weight value, we find that for first-class scientific journals editors, the values and attitudes are the core indicators, professional knowledge and skills are the basic indicators, and psychological quality is the key indicator that cannot be ignored. Conclusions] The evaluation index system, with a more comprehensive index structure and a more scientific index weight calculation method, can provide basic data and theoretical method guidance for relevant departments to formulate a standardized professional quality evaluation system for first-class scientific journals editors, and offer some references for the evaluation of professional quality, talent selection, talent training, and talent assessment of editors.