首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中国疾病预防控制系统慢性非传染性疾病预防控制能力评估
引用本文:尹香君,施小明,司向,高欣,翟屹.中国疾病预防控制系统慢性非传染性疾病预防控制能力评估[J].中华流行病学杂志,2010,31(10):1125-1129.
作者姓名:尹香君  施小明  司向  高欣  翟屹
作者单位:1. 中国疾病预防控制中心慢性病社区处,北京,102206
2. 协和医学院
基金项目:湖南省农村公共卫生综合试点基金资助项目
摘    要:目的 了解全国疾病预防控制系统慢性病预防控制(防控)能力.方法 问卷调查全国省、地(市)和县(区)级所有疾病预防控制中心(CDC)慢性非传染性疾病(慢病)防控的资源、能力及开展的项目. 结果(1)资源:全国有7483人从事慢病防控,占CDC总人数的4.0%;有23.6%的人在2008年投入慢病防控不足6个月.省、地和县级防控经费占同级CDC总经费的比例依次为2.29%、1.70%和2.69%.(2)能力:省、地和县级CDC慢病科所设置比例依次为100.0%、62.8%和43.7%;人员中本科以上学历占34.7%、高级职称占12.1%,其中61.7%从事慢病防控工作不足5年;平均继续教育人次数省级为21.90,地级为4.60,县级为1.68;有8.7%的CDC派人外出进修.省级CDC均开展了慢病监测,仅4.2%的CDC出版过慢病报告;在慢病防控工作中,主要与卫生部门内部机构合作.(3)开展的项目:分别有43.5%和30.8%的县级CDC开展过监测和干预项目. 结论中国疾控系统慢病防控资源匮乏,经费和人员与慢病疾病负担不相称;慢病防控能力有待提高.

关 键 词:慢性非传染性疾病  预防控制  能力  评估
收稿时间:2010/3/25 0:00:00
修稿时间:2012/6/1 0:00:00

Assessment of capacity for chronic noncommunicable diseases prevention and control of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Organizations in China
YIN Xiang-jun,SHI Xiao-ming,SI Xiang,GA Xin and ZHAI Yi.Assessment of capacity for chronic noncommunicable diseases prevention and control of the Center for Disease Control and Prevention Organizations in China[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2010,31(10):1125-1129.
Authors:YIN Xiang-jun  SHI Xiao-ming  SI Xiang  GA Xin and ZHAI Yi
Institution:Division of Chronic Disease Control and Community Health, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the capacity for noncommunicable diseases(NCDs)prevention and control in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDCs)in China. Methods All CDCs in China, including provincial, city and county CDCs were surveyed by questionnaires designed by China CDC including resource provided, capacity and efforts for NCDs. Results(1)Resource: 7483 staff members worked on NCDs prevention and control, only accounting for 4.0% of all the CDCs' personnel; 23.6% of the staff members devoted their time to NCDs control less than 6months in 2008. Fundings for NCDs prevention and control only accounted for 2.29%, 1.70% and2.69% of the total funds of provincial, city and county CDCs, respectively.(2)Capacity: The proportions of CDCs that had professional institutes of NCD at provincial, city and county level were 100.0%, 62.8% and 43.7% respectively. CDCs mainly cooperated with health agencies regarding NCDs prevention and control programs. 34.7% of the staff members had educational background of college undergraduate or higher, 12.1% had senior professional titles, 61.7% of them worked for NCDs less than 5 years. The average person-times of continuing education in NCDs were 21.90,4.60and 1.68 at the provincial, city and county CDCs respectively. 8.7% of the CDCs sent their staff members for advanced studies on NCDs. All provincial CDCs carried out surveillance but only 4.2%of them published reports of NCDs in all the CDCs during the past three years.(3)Efforts: 43.5% and 30.8% of the county CDCs carried out surveillance and intervention of NCDs respectively in 2008.Conclusion Resources for NCDs prevention and control were quite limited in CDCs. Fundings and staff members for NCDs were not enough, compared to the heavy disease burden of NCDs. Capacityfor NCDs prevention and control need to be improved.
Keywords:Chronic noncommunicable diseases  Prevention and control  Capacity  Assessment
本文献已被 万方数据 PubMed 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号