首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基于队列研究估计暴露因素与罕见结局关联的统计方法选择题录
引用本文:刘晓航,王晨,严若华,彭晓霞,阴赪宏.基于队列研究估计暴露因素与罕见结局关联的统计方法选择题录[J].中华流行病学杂志,2023,44(7):1126-1132.
作者姓名:刘晓航  王晨  严若华  彭晓霞  阴赪宏
作者单位:国家儿童医学中心/首都医科大学附属北京儿童医院/临床流行病与循证医学中心, 北京 100045;首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院中心实验室, 北京 100026
基金项目:国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000105);国家自然科学基金(72174128);北京市自然科学基金-海淀原始创新联合基金(L222124);北京市医院管理中心“青苗”计划专项(QML20231208)
摘    要:比值比(OR)和相对危险度(RR)均是评估暴露因素与研究结局间关联的常用指标, 在罕见结局的队列中, OR值常被用作RR值的近似估计, 但RR值的意义更加清晰易解释。本研究旨在基于罕见结局队列研究, 比较不同多因素回归模型获得RR与OR估计值的差别, 为基于队列研究估计暴露因素与罕见结局间关联关系时选择多因素回归方法, 以及优先报告关联大小估计指标提供参考。本研究基于中国出生队列数据开展实例研究, 以全部病种的出生缺陷为研究结局, 以受孕方式为暴露因素, 纳入孕妇年龄、是否有出生缺陷家族史等有明确证据支持的变量作为协变量, 分别拟合logistic回归、log-binomial回归以及Poisson回归, 并比较OR和RR的点估计值及其95%CI。结果表明, 在罕见结局队列研究中logistic回归估计的OR值与log-binomial回归及Poisson回归估计的RR值近似, 但log-binomial回归及Poisson回归估计的效应值更接近1.00, 且效应值的95%CI分布更窄, 但可能存在不收敛或过离散问题。针对罕见结局的队列研究, 在适用前提下, 推荐优先报告基于log-b...

关 键 词:队列研究  罕见结局  比值比  相对危险度  多因素回归
收稿时间:2023/1/6 0:00:00

Selection of statistical methods for estimating the association between exposure factors and rare outcomes based on cohort studies
Liu Xiaohang,Wang Chen,Yan Ruohu,Peng Xiaoxi,Yin Chenghong.Selection of statistical methods for estimating the association between exposure factors and rare outcomes based on cohort studies[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2023,44(7):1126-1132.
Authors:Liu Xiaohang  Wang Chen  Yan Ruohu  Peng Xiaoxi  Yin Chenghong
Institution:Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Beijing Children''s Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Center for Children Health, Beijing 100045, China; Department of Central Laboratory, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University/Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
Abstract:Odds ratio (OR) and relative risk (RR) are the most commonly used statistical indicators for the estimation of the association between exposure and outcome. In the cohort study with rare outcomes, the estimated OR approximately equals RR, but RR seems more interpretable. The study aims to explore the difference between OR and RR estimated by different multivariate analyses to provide reference for the selection of more appropriate multivariate regression methods and reporting indicators for estimating the association between exposure and rare outcome in cohort studies. This case study used the data from China birth cohort study. Modes of conception and congenital disabilities were regarded as exposure and outcome, respectively. Maternal age, family history of congenital disabilities with clear evidence were included as covariates. Logistic regression, log-binomial regression, and Poisson regression were used to estimate the OR and RR, respectively. Then, OR, RR, and their 95%CI estimated by three regression models were compared. The OR estimated by logistic regression was approximately equal to the RR estimated by log-binomial regression or Poisson regression. However, the RR estimated by log-binomial regression or Poisson regression was closer to 1.00, with a narrower 95%CI. Log-binomial regression or Poisson regression might have non convergence or over dispersion problems. It is recommended to report the RR obtained by log-binomial regression or Poisson regression in the cohort study with rare outcomes if applicable.
Keywords:Cohort study  Rare outcome  Odds ratio  Relative risk  Multivariate analysis
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号