首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经济收人对男男性接触者艾滋病高危性行为的影响研究
引用本文:史同新,张北川,李秀芳,徐敬星,汪宁,周生建,管文辉,张敬东.经济收人对男男性接触者艾滋病高危性行为的影响研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2008,29(5):426-429.
作者姓名:史同新  张北川  李秀芳  徐敬星  汪宁  周生建  管文辉  张敬东
作者单位:1. 青岛大学医学院附属医院,266003
2. 山东省胶南市人民医院
3. 中国疾病预防控制中心
4. 重庆市渝中区人口与计划生育生殖健康中心
5. 江苏省疾病预防控制中心
6. 哈尔滨市疾病预防控制中心
摘    要:目的 探讨中国男男性接触者(MSM)中不同经济收入人群艾滋病高危性行为状况.方法 采用定向抽样方法,对9个城市2250例MSM进行匿名问卷调查,比较高、中、低经济收入人群的高危性行为发生状况.结果 高和中等收入组累计同性性伴数(平均分别为110.17个和71.97个)、同性口交性伴数(平均分别为62.45个和46.6个)、同性肛交性伴数(平均分别为52.21个和32.3个)均明显高于低收入组(P<0.01),高收入组累计同性性伴数、同性口交性伴数及同性肛交性伴数均明显高于中等收入组(P<0.05).高和中等收入组最近一次肛交安全套使用率(分别为79.03%和77.29%)明显高于低收入组(P<0.01).高收入组最近一次与男性性工作者性交(3.81%)百分率明显高于中等及低收入组(P<0.01).高和中等收人组曾经向男性"买"性(分别为24.27%和14.7%)的百分率明显高于低收入组(P<0.01),高收入组曾经向男性"买"性的百分率明显高于中等收入组(P<0.01).高和中等收入组是男性性工作者(分别为6.72%和11.05%)的百分率明显低于低收入组(P<0.01),高收人组是男性性工作者的百分率明显低于中等收入组(P<0.01).结论 MSM中不同经济状况人群具有某些不同的AIDS高危性行为,较好的经济状况并不能制约高危性行为,因此对不同的亚人群应制定和实施相应的AIDS干预措施.

关 键 词:艾滋病  男男性接触者  高危性行为  经济收入
收稿时间:2008/1/11 0:00:00

Study on the comparison of high risk behaviors related to AIDS among different status of income in men who have had sex with men
SHI Tongxin,ZHANG Bei-chuan,LI Xiu-fang,XU Jing-xing,WANG Ning,ZHOU Sheng-jian,GUAN Wen-hui and ZHANG Jing-dong.Study on the comparison of high risk behaviors related to AIDS among different status of income in men who have had sex with men[J].Chinese Journal of Epidemiology,2008,29(5):426-429.
Authors:SHI Tongxin  ZHANG Bei-chuan  LI Xiu-fang  XU Jing-xing  WANG Ning  ZHOU Sheng-jian  GUAN Wen-hui and ZHANG Jing-dong
Institution:The Affliated Hospital of the Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China;The Affliated Hospital of the Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China;The Affliated Hospital of the Medical College, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266003, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the effects of socioeconomic status on the distribution of cardiovascular risk factors and clinicaltreatments of patients with acute myocardial infarction in Beijing.Methods In Beijing, a prospective, muhi-center, registration study was carried out which including 800 patients who were consecutively hospitalized for ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction within 24 hours after event attack in 19 different hospitals in Beijing between November, 2005 and December, 2006.Indicators of socioeconomic status included self-reported personal income (<500, 500-2000,>2000 RMB/month), educational attainment (≤ 12 and > 12 years) and status of medical insurance (yes/no).According to categories of education, patients were categorized into two groups of lower socioeconomic status and higher socioeconomic status. Differences of cardiovascular risk factors and clinical treatments were compared across the two groups respectively. Results Proportion of diabetes and hyperlipidemia in patients with higher socioeconomic status was much higher than that of patients with lower socioeconomic status (P<0.05, P<0.01 respectively). Patients with lower socioeconomic status were more likely to be smokers (P <0.05). The rates of receiving coronary angiography and PTCA were much lower in patients with lower socioeconomic status. Medical insurance and income were the most important two socioeconomic factors determining the use of PTCA. Conclusion Compared to patients with lowersocioeconomic status,patients with higher socioeconomic status had higher rates of hyperlipidemia and diabetes but lower smoking rate among cardiovascular risk factors. The rates of receiving interventional therapies were much lower in patients with lower socioeconomic status.
Keywords:AIDS  Men who have sex with men  High risk sexual behavior  Income
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华流行病学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号