临床医学科技成果评价指标体系研究

目的 建立一套科学、客观、合理、定性与定量相结合、可操作性强的临床医学科技成果评价指标体系,为科学评价临床医学科技成果提供参考依据.方法 采用Delphi专家咨询法对30位专家进行问卷咨询,确定指标体系及其权重.结果 问卷回收率100%.通过两轮咨询专家意见达到高度统一,专家意见的协调系数为0.963.最终的评价体系包含3个一级指标、8个二级指标和18个三级指标,确定了各级指标的权重.结论 专家积极性和意见一致性高,确立的临床医学科技成果评价指标体系可用于临床医学科技成果的综合评价,对于临床医学科技成果为临床服务,解决临床问题具有导向作用.

Abstract：

Objective To set up a scientific, objective, reasonable, qualitative and quantitative,operational evaluation index system of clinical science and technology achievements, which provides the reference to evaluating clinieal science and technology achievements scientifieally. Methods The Delphi method was used to investigate 30 experts for weight of the index via questionnaire. Results The response rate was 100%. The Kendall's concordance coefficient was up to 0. 963. The final index system includes three first-class indicators, eight second-class indicators and 18 third-class indicators. The weight coefficeient of each class was identified. Conclusion The experts showed enthusiasm for this investigation. The agreement of respondents was high after two rounds of investigation. The index system can be used in comprehensive evaluation for science and technology achievements in clinical medicine. The index system takes a guiding effect for science and technology achievements to solve clinical services and problems.

Study on evaluation index system of clinical science and technology achievements

Objective To set up a scientific, objective, reasonable, qualitative and quantitative,operational evaluation index system of clinical science and technology achievements, which provides the reference to evaluating clinieal science and technology achievements scientifieally. Methods The Delphi method was used to investigate 30 experts for weight of the index via questionnaire. Results The response rate was 100%. The Kendall's concordance coefficient was up to 0. 963. The final index system includes three first-class indicators, eight second-class indicators and 18 third-class indicators. The weight coefficeient of each class was identified. Conclusion The experts showed enthusiasm for this investigation. The agreement of respondents was high after two rounds of investigation. The index system can be used in comprehensive evaluation for science and technology achievements in clinical medicine. The index system takes a guiding effect for science and technology achievements to solve clinical services and problems.