首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        


Burden of treatment for chronic illness: a concept analysis and review of the literature
Authors:Adem Sav PhD  Michelle A King PhD  Jennifer A Whitty PhD  Elizabeth Kendall PhD  Sara S McMillan BPharm  Fiona Kelly PhD  Beth Hunter BA  Amanda J Wheeler PhD
Institution:1. Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld, Australia;2. School of Pharmacy, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Qld, Australia;3. Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld, Australia;4. Director of Research, Health and Wellbeing Stream, Griffith Health Institute, Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld, Australia;5. School of Pharmacy, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand;6. Griffith University, Meadowbrook, Qld, Australia;7. Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
Abstract:

Context

Treatment burden, the burden associated with the treatment and management of chronic illness, has not yet been well articulated.

Objective

Using Rodgers'' (1989, Journal of Advanced Nursing, 14, 330–335) method of concept analysis, this review describes the ways in which treatment burden has been conceptualized to define the concept and to develop a framework for understanding its attributes, antecedents and consequences.

Methods

Leading databases were searched electronically between the years 2002 and 2011. To ensure the review focused on actual observations of the concept of interest, articles that did not measure treatment burden (either qualitatively or quantitatively) were excluded. An inductive approach was used to identify themes related to the concept of treatment burden.

Main results

Thirty articles, identified from 1557 abstracts, were included in the review. The attributes of treatment burden include burden as a dynamic process, as a multidimensional concept, and comprising of both subjective and objective elements. Prominent predisposing factors (antecedents) include the person''s age and gender, their family circumstances, possible comorbidity, high use of medications, characteristics of treatment and their relationship with their health‐care provider. The most dominant consequences are poor health and well‐being, non‐adherence to treatment, ineffective resource use and burden on significant others. Furthermore, many of these consequences can also become antecedents, reflecting the cyclic and dynamic nature of treatment burden.

Conclusion

The findings underscore the need for researchers and health‐care professionals to engage in collaborative discussions and make cooperative efforts to help alleviate treatment burden and tailor treatment regimens to the realities of people''s daily lives.
Keywords:chronic illness  concept analysis  health professional  medication burden  treatment burden
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号