首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

某综合性三甲医院科研成果产出调查
引用本文:叶强,张从昕.某综合性三甲医院科研成果产出调查[J].解放军医院管理杂志,2016(5):431-434.
作者姓名:叶强  张从昕
作者单位:1. 第二军医大学长海医院医教部,上海,200433;2. 第二军医大学长海医院,上海,200433
摘    要:目的:了解临床医师的科研产出情况及不同科研产出成果在临床医师科研评价中的重要性。方法以某大型综合性三甲医院的科研管理者和临床医师为目标人群,通过资料收集、专家咨询、问卷调查等方法,分析临床医师学术成果的产出现状,采用简单专家咨询法对多种学术成果作为科研评价指标的重要性进行评估。结果临床医师学术论文和基金课题产出量较高,专利和学术专著/教材/工具书产出量中等,技术标准产出量最低。专家咨询结果显示,学术论文和基金课题的重要性最高,权重均为0.228;其次是技术标准和专利,权重分别为0.200和0.198;学术专著/教材/工具书的权重最低,为0.147。结论实用性较强的专利和技术标准产出量较低,但专家认为其重要性较高,提示在科研评价中有必要科学地衡量各种成果的权重。

关 键 词:科研成果  科研评价  专家咨询法  问卷调查

Investigation and Analysis of the Scientific Research Output of a National Tertiary Hospital
Abstract:Objective To investigate the situation of the scientific research outputs of clinical doctors and the significance of different research outputs in the scientific research evaluation of clinical doctors .Methods The target groups include scientific research administrators and clinic doctors in a national tertiary hospital .Data collec-tion, expert consultation and questionnaire investigation are carried out to analyze the current situation of the academ -ic outputs of the clinical doctors .Simple expert consultation is adopted to evaluate the significance of multiple aca -demic outputs as the research evaluation standards .Results The output of academic papers and funded projects is the highest , the output of patents and treatises/teaching materials/reference books is the second , and the output of the technical standards is the lowest .The results of expert consultation show that the significance of academic papers and funded projects is the highest , with both weighing 0.228;technical standards and patents come next , with the weights of 0.200 and 0.198 respectively;treatises/teaching materials/reference book sare the least significant , with the weight of 0.147.Conclusion Patents and technical standards which have more practical significance but lower output arevalued by experts , suggesting the weight of different research outputs should be measured scientifically .
Keywords:scientific research output  scientific research evaluation  expert consultation method  ques-tionnaire investigation
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号