| 国家自然科学基金未获资助原因分析及对策探讨 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 闫雪冬,陈瑛,张焕萍.国家自然科学基金未获资助原因分析及对策探讨[J].中华医学科研管理杂志,2010,23(4):235-237,240. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 闫雪冬 陈瑛 张焕萍 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京大学临床肿瘤学院、北京肿瘤医院暨北京市肿瘤防治研究所科研处,100142 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 国家自然科学基金的申请竞争越来越激烈，为了解申请项目未获资助的原因，进一步提高中标率，对肿瘤医院2004-2008年未获资助的国家自然科学基金申请书的同行评议意见进行总结分析。结果显示，91份申请书中立项依据、研究内容、研究方案、创新性、工作基础与研究队伍、申请书撰写等部分均存在不同程度的不足。通过分析申请书未获资助的原因，科研管理部门可以采取相应对策，有针对性地避免上述部分的不足，提高申请书的质量，为进一步提高中标率奠定基础。
|
| 关 键 词： | 国家自然科学基金 中标率 同行评议意见 未获资助原因 |
Analysis of the reasons for failures in applying to China Natural Science Foundation and suggestions |
| |
| YAN Xue-dong,CHEN Ying,ZHANG Huan-ping.Analysis of the reasons for failures in applying to China Natural Science Foundation and suggestions[J].Chinese Journal of Medical Science Research Management,2010,23(4):235-237,240. |
| |
| Authors: | YAN Xue-dong CHEN Ying ZHANG Huan-ping |
| |
| Institution: | YAN Xue-dong, CHEN ring, ZHANG Huan-piag. (Key laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research ( Ministry of Education), Department of Scientific Research, Peking University School of Oncology, Beijing Cancer Hospital ＆ Institute, Beijing 100142, P. R. China ) |
| |
| Abstract: | It is getting very competitive in the application to Natural Science Foundation of China.To improve the chances of success in the application, we summarized and analyzed the peer review opinions for the 91 failed applications from 2004 to 2008. Problems were disclosed for these application projects in scientific significance, research content, research design, novelty, preparative research, research group,and application writing. Countermeasures were proposed for the department of research to improve the application quality. |
| |
| Keywords: | Natural Science Foundation of China Gain rate Peer review opinions Failure reasons |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
