首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

热灭活对输血相关感染标志物的影响
引用本文:佘宇奇,刘琼,周俭辉,戴立忠,邓勇,李宁.热灭活对输血相关感染标志物的影响[J].中国感染控制杂志,2020,19(6):498-503.
作者姓名:佘宇奇  刘琼  周俭辉  戴立忠  邓勇  李宁
作者单位:1. 中南大学湘雅医院输血科, 湖南 长沙 410008;2. 湖南师范大学附属第一医院检验科, 湖南 长沙 410006;3. 湖南圣湘科技股份有限公司研发部, 湖南 长沙 410205
基金项目:长沙市新型冠状病毒感染的肺炎疫情应急专题科技计划项目(kq2001053)
摘    要: 目的 探讨热灭活对血清和全血两种不同类型标本中输血相关感染标志物结果的影响。方法 收集乙型肝炎病毒表面抗原(HBsAg)、丙型肝炎病毒抗体(抗-HCV)、人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体(抗-HIV)、梅毒螺旋体抗体(抗-TP)、乙型肝炎病毒(HBV) DNA和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV) RNA阳性血清标本共57份,HBsAg、抗-HCV、抗-TP和HBV DNA阳性全血标本共38份。将标本56℃水浴加热30 min灭活(可有效灭活冠状病毒)处理后,采用化学发光和荧光定量聚合酶链式反应(PCR)分别检测相应的项目,比较热灭活前后各指标的差异。结果 血清灭活后HBsAg、抗-HCV、抗-HIV、抗-TP、HBV DNA和HCV RNA检测结果与灭活前相比,差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);全血灭活后HBsAg、抗-HCV、抗-TP和HBV DNA检测值与灭活前相比,差异亦均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);Bland-Altman散点图显示 所有的差值数据均位于95%一致性界限(95%LoA)内,各指标灭活后与灭活前存在较好的一致性。结论 56℃水浴加热 30 min的处理方法对输血相关感染标志物的检测无明显影响,在新型冠状病毒疫情期间可考虑推广使用。

关 键 词:新型冠状病毒  热灭活  全血  血清  输血相关感染  
收稿时间:2020/2/26 0:00:00

Effect of heat inactivation on blood transfusion-related infection markers
SHE Yu-qi,LIU Qiong,ZHOU Jian-hui,DAI Li-zhong,DENG Yong,LI Ning.Effect of heat inactivation on blood transfusion-related infection markers[J].Chinese Journal of Infection Control,2020,19(6):498-503.
Authors:SHE Yu-qi  LIU Qiong  ZHOU Jian-hui  DAI Li-zhong  DENG Yong  LI Ning
Institution:1. Blood Transfusion Department, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha 410008, China;2. Department of Laboratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410006, China;3. Research and Development Department, Hunan Sansure Biotech Inc., Changsha 410205, China
Abstract:Objective To explore the effect of heat inactivation on blood transfusion-related infection markers in serum and whole blood specimens. Methods A total of 57 positive serum specimens of hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg), anti-hepatitis C virus antibody (anti-HCV), anti-human immunodeficiency virus antibody (anti-HIV), anti-Treponema pallidum antibody (anti-TP), HBV DNA and HCV RNA as well as a total of 38 positive whole blood specimens of HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-TP and HBV DNA were collected. After specimens were inactivated in a water bath at 56℃ for 30 minutes (which can effectively inactivate coronavirus), chemiluminescence and fluorescence quantitative polymerase chain reaction were adopted to detect the corresponding markers, differences among indicators before and after heat inactivation were compared. Results After serum was inactivated, detected results of HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-HIV, anti-TP, HBV DNA and HCV RNA were not significantly different from those before inactivation (all P>0.05); after whole blood was inactivated, detection results of HBsAg, anti-HCV, anti-TP and HBV DNA were not statistically different from those before inactivation (all P>0.05); Bland-Altman scatterplot showed that all the difference data were within 95% limits of agreement (95% LoA), there was a good consistency in each indicator before and after inactivation. Conclusion The treatment method of heating at 56℃ water bath for 30 minutes has no obvious effect on the detection of blood transfusion-related infection markers, and can be widely used during the epidemic of coronavirus disease 2019.
Keywords:2019-nCoV|heat inactivation|whole blood|serum|blood transfusion-related infection
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国感染控制杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国感染控制杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号