首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

Z,H两省医疗质量监管模式比较研究
引用本文:梁铭会,马丽平,吴奇飞.Z,H两省医疗质量监管模式比较研究[J].中国医院管理,2010,30(10):13-16.
作者姓名:梁铭会  马丽平  吴奇飞
作者单位:1. 卫生部医院管理研究所,北京,100191;华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,湖北,武汉,430030
2. 卫生部医院管理研究所,北京,100191
3. 华中科技大学同济医学院医药卫生管理学院,湖北,武汉,430030
基金项目:WHO资助课题"基本医疗服务监管体系比较研究" 
摘    要:尽管Z,H两省受卫生行政部门委托具体从事医疗质量监管的机构在独立程度、经费来源和医疗质量监管专家来源等方面存在诸多不同,但经过深入分析,这两种模式在其目的、内在的委托代理结构、应解决的代理风险和解决方式等方面都存在相似之处。而这些相似之处昭示着我国不同地区在构建医疗质量监管体系时必须解决的共同问题以及在解决这些问题时所必须遵循的一般规律。

关 键 词:医疗质量  监管模式  比较研究

Comparative Tudy on Medical Quality Regulatory Modes in Both Z and H Province
LIANG Ming-hui,MA Li-ping,WU Qi-fei.Comparative Tudy on Medical Quality Regulatory Modes in Both Z and H Province[J].Chinese Hospital Management,2010,30(10):13-16.
Authors:LIANG Ming-hui  MA Li-ping  WU Qi-fei
Institution:National Institute of Hospital Administration,Beijing,100191,China
Abstract:There exist differences in the medical quality regulatory modes in both Z and H provinces,such as the independence extent of medical quality regulatory agencies,the resource of medical quality regulatory agencies' funds and the sources of medical quality regulatory experts.Based on deep analysis,we find that there also exist similarities in both modes' establishment intentions,interior principal-agent structures and the solutions to avoid the principle-agent risks.The similarities perhaps indicate the common problems and the common rules to solve these problems when China' s different regions establish their own regulatory modes of medical quality.
Keywords:medical quality  regulatory modes  comparative study
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号