| 不同分析方法测定尿铅的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王凤兰, 刘艳, 张荔彦, 徐锐. 不同分析方法测定尿铅的比较[J]. 中国公共卫生, 2000, 16(2): 184-184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2000-16-02-75 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王凤兰 刘艳 张荔彦 徐锐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1.沈阳医学院 沈阳110031;;2.辽宁大学分析测试中心 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 尿铅的测定是铅作业工人生物监测及职业病中毒诊断的重要指标之一.测定尿铅一般采用二硫腙比色法和原子吸收法.
|
| 关 键 词： | 铅中毒 尿铅 测定方法 比较分析 |
| 收稿时间： | 1999-08-16 |
| 修稿时间： | 1999-11-29 |
Comparative Study on Determination of Uric Lead By Different Methods |
| |
| Wang Fenglan, . Comparative Study on Determination of Uric Lead By Different Methods[J]. Chinese Journal of Public Health, 2000, 16(2): 184-184. DOI: 10.11847/zgggws2000-16-02-75 |
| |
| Authors: | Wang Fenglan |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1.Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang 110031 |
| |
| Abstract: | We measured the level of uric lead in workers exposured and nonexposured lead by DPSA,GFAAS and DCM.The basic parameters of the three methods demonstrated that sensitivity and precision of DPSA and GFAAS excelled that of DCM,but the linear range of DPSA and GFAAS are more narrow than that of DCM.All of The three methods had excellent accuracy(paired t-test P>0 05).The results showed the different of the three methods no significant. |
| |
| Keywords: | Uric lead Differential Potentiometric Stripping Analysis(DPSA)Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy(GFAAS)Dithizone Colorimetric Method(DCM) |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《中国公共卫生》浏览原始摘要信息 |
|
点击此处可从《中国公共卫生》下载全文 |
