首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

中国疾病预防控制中心公共职能的界定
引用本文:苏忠鑫,马宁,谢洪彬,王伟成,王颖,孙梅,罗力,于竞进,于明珠,段勇,龚向光,陈政,汪华,施培武,梁占凯,杨峰,王敦志,岳建宁,罗实,郝模.中国疾病预防控制中心公共职能的界定[J].卫生研究,2005,34(3):257-260.
作者姓名:苏忠鑫  马宁  谢洪彬  王伟成  王颖  孙梅  罗力  于竞进  于明珠  段勇  龚向光  陈政  汪华  施培武  梁占凯  杨峰  王敦志  岳建宁  罗实  郝模
作者单位:1. 复旦大学卫生发展战略研究中心,上海,200032
2. 中华人民共和国卫生部疾病控制司
3. 中华人民共和国卫生部人事司
4. 中国疾病预防控制中心
5. 上海嘉定区疾病预防控制中心
6. 江苏省疾病预防控制中心
7. 浙江省疾病预防控制中心
8. 河北省卫生厅疾病控制处
9. 山西省卫生厅疾病控制处
10. 四川省疾病预防控制中心
11. 青海省疾病预防控制中心
12. 贵州省疾病预防控制中心
基金项目:国家杰出青年基金 (No.7992 50 0 2 ),卫生部科研基金资助项目
摘    要:目的 明确中国疾病预防控制中心公共职能的落实程度。方法 采用分层随机抽样法,在全国范围内抽取16 1个疾病预防控制中心,调查样本机构公共职能项目开展比例以及开展项目的操作程度。结果 (1)疾病预防控制中心公共职能项目的平均落实程度为4 2. 9% ,其中省级为5 6. 0 % ,市级为4 3. 7% ,县级为4 1. 3% ;东部地区为4 9. 3% ,中部地区为4 5 . 4 % ,西部地区为35. 3%。(2 )疾病预防控制中心七项公共职能中,疾病预防与控制落实程度职能落实程度为5 4 3%、突发公共卫生事件应急处置为6 5 . 8%、疫情报告及健康相关因素信息管理为35 . 0 %、健康危害因素监测与控制为31 .3%、实验室检测与评价39 .1%、健康教育与健康促进为36 .4 %、技术指导与应用研究为5 6 . 7%。结论 中国疾病预防控制中心各项公共职能落实程度普遍不高,并随地区和级别的变化而变化;各项公共职能中,突发公共卫生事件应急处置职能落实程度最高,健康危害因素监测与控制职能落实程度最低。

关 键 词:疾病预防控制中心  公共职能  落实程度
文章编号:1000-8020(2005)03-0257-03
修稿时间:2005年2月15日

Implementation analysis of public functions of centers of disease prevention and control of China
Su Zhong-xin,Ma Ning,Xie Hong-bin,Wang Wei-cheng,et al..Implementation analysis of public functions of centers of disease prevention and control of China[J].Journal of Hygiene Research,2005,34(3):257-260.
Authors:Su Zhong-xin  Ma Ning  Xie Hong-bin  Wang Wei-cheng  
Institution:Research Center of Health Development Strategies, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China.
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the implementation of public function and items of the centers of disease prevention and control(CDC). Methods 161 centers of disease prevention and control have been investigated by two-stage stratified sampling. The implementation analysis of public function and items of CDC is measured by multiplying average operational proportion and average operational degree.Results 1. For investigated centers, the average rate of function implementation is 42.9%,with 56.0% at provincial level and 43.7% at city level, 41.3% for the county level; while 49.3% in east areas, 45.4% in middle areas and 35.3% in west areas. 2.Among all 7 functional items, the implemented rate of disease prevention and control is 54.3%, 65.8% for emergency treatment, 35.0% for epidemic situation report and information management of health relative factors, 31.3% for inspection and control of health risk factors, 39.1% for the laboratory examination and evaluation, 36.4% for health education and health promotion, and 56.7% for technological guidance and application study. Conclusion The implemented degree of public function of CDC was generally lower, varied with regions and levels. Among 7 public functional items, the emergency treatment function had the highest implementation, with the lowest for the inspection and control of health relative factors.
Keywords:CDC  public function  implementation  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号