Institution: | 1. Department of Hemato-Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy;2. Immuno-hematology and Transfusion Medicine Service, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy;3. Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy;4. Division of Hematology 1, Azienda Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy;5. Department of Medical and Surgery Science, Hematology Unit, University of Catania, Catania, Italy;6. Department of Hematology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy;7. Division of Hematology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy;8. Division of Hematology, Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I di Torino, Turin, Italy;9. Hemato-Oncology Division, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
University Department “Scienze della Salute” (DISS), University of Milan, Milan, Italy;10. Divisione Universitaria di Ematologia, Ospedale San Carlo, Potenza, Italy;11. Hematology Unit, Department of Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy;12. Lymphoma Unit, Department of Onco-Hematology, IRCCS Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy;13. Department of Oncology and Hematology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
Department of Oncology and Hematology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy |
Abstract: | Among patients with advanced-stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) receiving ABVD chemotherapy, PET performed after the first two treatment cycles (PET-2) has prognostic value. However, 15% of patients with a negative PET-2 will experience treatment failure. Here we prospectively evaluated serum thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) levels, to improve risk assessment in patients treated according to HD0607 PET-driven trial (#NCT00795613). In 266 patients with available serum samples, who have agreed to participate in a sub-study for assessment of the role of TARC monitoring, serum TARC levels were measured at baseline and at time of PET-2 by commercially available ELISA test kits. The primary end-point was to evaluate the association between TARC after 2 ABVD cycles and PFS. Median TARC-2 values were significantly higher in PET-2-positive patients compared to PET-2-negative patients (P = .001), and in patients with treatment failure compared to those in continuous CR (P = .01). The 4-year PFS significantly differed between patients with TARC-2 >800 pg/mL vs ≤800 pg/mL (64% vs 86%, P = .0001). Moreover, among PET-2-negative patients, elevated TARC-2 identified those with a worse prognosis (74% vs 89%; P = .01). In multivariable analysis, TARC-2 >800 pg/mL was a significant independent predictor of PFS in the whole study population (HR 2.39, P = .004) and among the PET-2-negative patients (HR 2.49, P = .02). In conclusion, our results indicate that TARC-2 serum levels above 800 pg/mL suggest the need for a stringent follow-up in PET-2-negative patients, and the evaluation of new drugs in PET-2-positive, who will likely fail to respond to intensification with escalated BEACOPP. |