Institution: | 1. Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada;2. Division of Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, McGill University and Cedars Cancer Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;3. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Research Institute of the McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;4. Cancer Care Manitoba Research Institute, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Department of Radiation Oncology, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada;5. Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;6. Department of Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada;7. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada;8. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada;9. Department of Physiology and Pathology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada;10. Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;11. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA;12. Division of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada |
Abstract: | Background During coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)–related operating room closures, some multidisciplinary thoracic oncology teams adopted a paradigm of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) as a bridge to surgery, an approach called SABR-BRIDGE. This study presents the preliminary surgical and pathological results. Methods Eligible participants from four institutions (three in Canada and one in the United States) had early-stage presumed or biopsy-proven lung malignancy that would normally be surgically resected. SABR was delivered using standard institutional guidelines, with surgery >3 months following SABR with standardized pathologic assessment. Pathological complete response (pCR) was defined as absence of viable cancer. Major pathologic response (MPR) was defined as ≤10% viable tissue. Results Seventy-two patients underwent SABR. Most common SABR regimens were 34 Gy/1 (29%, n = 21), 48 Gy/3–4 (26%, n = 19), and 50/55 Gy/5 (22%, n = 16). SABR was well-tolerated, with one grade 5 toxicity (death 10 days after SABR with COVID-19) and five grade 2–3 toxicities. Following SABR, 26 patients underwent resection thus far (13 pending surgery). Median time-to-surgery was 4.5 months post-SABR (range, 2–17.5 months). Surgery was reported as being more difficult because of SABR in 38% (n = 10) of cases. Thirteen patients (50%) had pCR and 19 (73%) had MPR. Rates of pCR trended higher in patients operated on at earlier time points (75% if within 3 months, 50% if 3–6 months, and 33% if ≥6 months; p = .069). In the exploratory best-case scenario analysis, pCR rate does not exceed 82%. Conclusions The SABR-BRIDGE approach allowed for delivery of treatment during a period of operating room closure and was well-tolerated. Even in the best-case scenario, pCR rate does not exceed 82%. |