首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

64层与320层CT对比观察冠状动脉支架
引用本文:岳军艳,李玉侠,王红坡,崔红凯,梁长华,窦文广,王清华,杨瑞民.64层与320层CT对比观察冠状动脉支架[J].中国介入影像与治疗学,2012,9(3):151-154.
作者姓名:岳军艳  李玉侠  王红坡  崔红凯  梁长华  窦文广  王清华  杨瑞民
作者单位:新乡医学院第一附属医院影像中心,河南卫辉,453100
基金项目:河南省卫生厅基金(201003078)。
摘    要:目的对比64层与320层螺旋CT显示冠状动脉及诊断冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄的价值。方法回顾性分析62例冠脉支架植入术后患者的64层(64层CT组,20例共38枚支架)和320层螺旋CT冠状动脉成像(320层CT组,42例共64枚支架)资料,对比两组图像质量、患者心率、有效辐射剂量(ED),并以CAG为"金标准"评价64层及320层螺旋CT对冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄的诊断能力。结果两组间图像质量评分差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05);患者心率、ED差异均有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。64层螺旋CT诊断冠状动脉支架植入术后再狭窄的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值及准确率分别为100%(5/5)、92.31%(24/26)、71.43%(5/7)、100%(24/24)及93.55%(29/31);320层螺旋CT分别为100%(11/11)、95.65%(44/46)、84.62%(11/13)、100%(44/44)及96.49%(55/57),差异均无统计学意义(P均〉0.05)。结论 64层及320层螺旋CT均可应用于冠状动脉支架植入术后随访,320层螺旋CT对患者心率的要求更低,患者接受的辐射剂量更少。

关 键 词:冠状血管  支架  体层摄影术  X线计算机
收稿时间:2011/7/20 0:00:00
修稿时间:2011/11/20 0:00:00

Comparative analysis between 64- and 320-slice spiral CT in observation of coronary artery stents
YUE Jun-yan,LI Yu-xi,WANG Hong-po,CUI Hong-kai,LIANG Chang-hu,DOU Wen-guang,WANG Qing-hua and YANG Rui-min.Comparative analysis between 64- and 320-slice spiral CT in observation of coronary artery stents[J].Chinese Journal of Interventional Imaging and Therapy,2012,9(3):151-154.
Authors:YUE Jun-yan  LI Yu-xi  WANG Hong-po  CUI Hong-kai  LIANG Chang-hu  DOU Wen-guang  WANG Qing-hua and YANG Rui-min
Institution:Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China;Image Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinxiang Medical University, Weihui 453100, China
Abstract:Objective To compare the value of 64-and 320-slice spiral CT in displaying coronary artery stents and diagnosing in-stent restenosis.Methods Data of 64(64-slice spiral CT group,including 20cases with 38stents) and 320(320slice spiral CT group,including 42cases with 64stents) slice spiral CT coronary angiography of 62patients after coronary artery stent implantation were retrospectively analyzed.The image quality,patients’heart rate and effective radiation dose(ED) of the two groups were compared.Moreover,the diagnostic ability for in-stent restenosis of 64-and 320-slice spiral CT were evaluated with CAG results as gold standards.Results There was no significant difference in image quality(P> 0.05) between two groups.Statistical differences were found in patients’heart rate and ED(both P<0.05).The sensitivity,specificity,positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of 64-slice spiral CT was 100%(5 / 5),92.31%(24 / 26),71.43%(5 / 7),100%(24 / 24) and 93.55%(29 / 31),respectively,that in 320-slice spiral CT group was 100%(11 / 11),95.65%(44 / 46),84.62%(11 / 13),100%(44 / 44),96.49%(55 / 57),respectively.No significant difference of above diagnostic indexes was found(all P>0.05).Conclusion Both 64-and 320-slice spiral CT can be used to follow-up after percutaneous coronary intervention,but 320-slice spiral CT have fewer requirements of patients’heart rate and less radiation.
Keywords:Coronary vessels  Stents  Tomography  X-ray computed
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国介入影像与治疗学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国介入影像与治疗学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号