体外循环和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术后心肌梗死发生率的Meta分析

目的 使用Meta分析比较常规体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(CCABG)和非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术(OPCAB)术后心肌梗死发生率的差异.方法 在 Medline、SCI、Cochrane图书馆临床对照试验注册库(CENTRAL)和中国生物医学文献光盘数据库(CBMdisc)检索中文和英文的相天随机对照临床试验,并检索相关文献的参考文献,检索时间截止至2009年1月.根据严格的纳入和排除标准,两名评价员独立地筛选文献,并按照Cochrane系统评价员手册5.0.0版所建议的评价方法 对纳入临床试验进行质量评价,最后将提取的资料用RevMan 5软件进行数据处理和分析.结果 共纳入22个试验进行Meta分析,OPCAB组共纳入1494例病人,心肌梗死总发生率为2.81%;CCABG组共1512例,心肌梗死总发生率为3.57%.Meta分析结果 显示OPCAB和CCABG术后心肌梗死发生率的差异尤统计学意义(OR=0.80,95%CI=0.54～1.20,P=0.28).结论 依据现有的随机对照试验进行Meta分析结果 显示,OPCAB和CCABG术后心肌梗死发生率的差异无统计学意义.

A meta-analysis for the incidence of postoperative myocardial infarction after off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass surgery

Objective The efficacy and safety of off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (OPCAB) as comparing with conventional coronary artery bypass grafting(CCABG) remain inconclusive in randomized, controlled trials and retrospective studies. We tried to assess the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) after OPCAB and CCABG. with a meta analysis based on published data in randomized ,controlled trials. Methods Relevant randomized controlled trials, published in English and Chinese before January 2009, were searched in Medline, the Science Citation Index Expanded, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and CBMdisc. Manual searching of bibliographies were performed, with key words "oronary artery bypass graft", "off-pump" and "myocardial infarction". Two reviewers selected eligible trials independently, performed quality assessment and collected relevant data. Meta-analysis was performed with software RevMan 5. Results 22 trials were considered to be eligible for the meta analysis. The incidence of MI was 2.81% (42/1494) in the OPCAB group as compared with 3.57% (54/1512) in the CCABG group. No significant difference was present between the two groups (OR =0.80,95% CI =0.54 - 1.20, P =0.28). Conclusion Our meta analysis of current available randomized controlled trials involving OPCAB and CCABG in patients with coronary artery diseases suggests that the difference in the incidence of postoperative MI between CCABG and OPCAB groups is not significant.