首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

胫骨干骨折带锁髓内钉固定和钢板螺钉固定的对比研究
引用本文:黄鹏,唐佩福,姚琦,梁雨田,陶笙,张群,郭义柱,梁向党,王岩.胫骨干骨折带锁髓内钉固定和钢板螺钉固定的对比研究[J].中国骨伤,2008,21(4):261-263.
作者姓名:黄鹏  唐佩福  姚琦  梁雨田  陶笙  张群  郭义柱  梁向党  王岩
作者单位:中国人民解放军总医院骨科,北京,100853
摘    要:目的:对照回顾性分析带锁髓内钉和钢板内固定两种方法治疗胫骨干骨折的效果。方法:髓内钉组32例(35处骨折),根据AO分型,42A型11处,42B型18处,42C型6处;钢板组42例(45处骨折),42A型10处,42B型22处,42C型13处。平均伤后手术时间在髓内钉和钢板组分别为3d和3.5d。随访评估患者手术时间,活动度,愈合时间,术后并发症之间的差别。结果:术后平均随访13个月(8~26个月)。髓内钉组平均手术时间为84min,钢板螺钉组平均为93min。髓内钉组踝关节平均背屈度为13°(0°~20°),钢板组为11°(0°~20°);跖屈分别为41°(30°~50°),47°(30°~50°)。愈合时间髓内钉组平均为3.3个月,钢板螺钉平均为3.5个月。术后X线片显示髓内钉固定有1例出现旋转畸形,钢板组有3例出现成角畸形,均为胫骨远端1/3骨折。结论:在治疗胫骨骨折方面,带锁髓内钉和钢板内固定两种方法都可以取得理想的效果。

关 键 词:胫骨骨折  骨折固定术  髓内  内固定器  临床对照试验
收稿时间:2007/10/30 0:00:00
修稿时间:2007年10月30

A comparisive study between intramedullary interlocking nail and plate-screw fixation in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures
HUANG Peng,TANG Pei-fu,YAO Qi,LIANG Yu-tian,TAO Sheng,ZHANG Qun,GUO Yi-zhu,LIANG Xiang-dang and WANG Yan.A comparisive study between intramedullary interlocking nail and plate-screw fixation in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures[J].China Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology,2008,21(4):261-263.
Authors:HUANG Peng  TANG Pei-fu  YAO Qi  LIANG Yu-tian  TAO Sheng  ZHANG Qun  GUO Yi-zhu  LIANG Xiang-dang and WANG Yan
Institution:Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China;Department of Orthopaedics,PLA General Hospital,Beijing 100853,China
Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the effects of tibial shaft fractures treatment with plate-screw or intramedullary interlocking nail. Methods: Thirty-five fractures were treated with intramedullary interlocking nail. Tape A,B and C were 11,18 and 6 cases respectively according to AO classification. Forty-five fractures were treated with plate-screw system. Type A,B and C were 10,22 and 13 cases respectively. The mean time between injury and operation was 3 days and 3.5 days respectively. The patients were evaluated with operation time,range of motion,time of bone union,and complications after a mean follow-up of 13 months(range 8 to 26 months). Results: The mean operation time and the mean range of motion of the ankle and knee were found similar in both groups. The average dorsiflexion angle of ankle was 13°(0° to 20°)in locked intramedullary nailing group and 11°(0° to 20°)in plate group. The average plantar flextion angle of ankle was 41°(30° to 50°)in locked intramedullary nailing group and 47°(30° to 50°)in plate-screw group. The mean time of bone union was 3.3 months with intramedullary nailing and 3.5 months with plate-screw fixation. Length discrepancy occurred in only two patients (2 and 2.5 cm) with intramedullary interlocking nail. One patient treated by intramedullary interlocking nail for a type III open fracture occured osteomyelitis. Plain radiographs showed rotation in two patients with intramedullary interlocking nail and angulation in 3 patients with plate-screw fixation,which were distal-third tibial fractures. Conclusion: Plate-screw osteosynthesis could attain satisfactory results in uncomminuted tibia shaft fractures,and locked intramedullary nailing is more appropriate in comminuted fractures.
Keywords:Tibial fractures  Fracture fixation  intramedullary  Internal fixators  Controlled clinical trials
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国骨伤》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国骨伤》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号