急性胆管炎腹腔镜胆总管探查后一期缝合与T管引流的临床研究

目的 探讨急性胆管炎腹腔镜胆总管探查后一期缝合与T管引流两种手术方式的特点,评估其可行性与安全性.方法 回顾性分析首都医科大学宣武医院普外科2012年1月-2014年12月100例急性胆管炎患者行腹腔镜胆囊切除+胆总管探查术患者的临床资料,其中54例(54％)患者行一期缝合,46例(46％)患者行T管引流.结果 100例患者均成功行手术治疗,手术时间缝合组显著短于T管组(96.72 minvs123.00 min,P=0.001),术中出血量缝合组与T管组相比显著减少(27.13 mlvs38.48 ml,P=0.009).缝合组术后胃肠功能恢复时间(1.57 dvs2.33 d,P=0.003)与术后住院时间(6.19 dvs9.20d,P=0.000)均显著短于T管组.两组术后腹腔总引流量(309.22mlvs212.46ml,P=0.070),引流时间(3.96 dvs4.02 d,P=0.875),术后胆漏发病率(9.3％ vs0,P=0.060),出血率(5.1％vs2.2％,P=0.622)差异均无统计学意义.结论 急性胆管炎腹腔镜胆总管探查后一期缝合严格掌握适应证后,与T管引流相比,同样安全有效.

Primary closure versus T-tube drainage following laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in acute cholangitis cases

Objective To compare the clinical efficacy of primary closure versus T-tube drainage after laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in acute cholangitis cases.Methods The clinical data of 100 patients with acute cholangitis undergoing laparoscopic common bile duct exploration from January 2012 to December 2014 were reviewed.54patients received primary closure of the common bile duct and 46 patients were subjected to T-tube drainage after choledochotomy.Results One hundred patients underwent the surgery successfully.Compared with the T-tube group,the operation time(96.72 min vs 123.00 min,P =0.001),intraoperative blood loss(27.13 ml vs 38.48 ml,P =0.009),postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery time(1.57 d vs 2.33 d,P=0.003) and postoperative hospital stay(6.19 d vs 9.20 d,P=0.000) were significantly less in the primary closure group.There were no statistical differences in the incidence of postoperative drainage (309.22 ml vs 212.46 ml,P =0.070),drainage time (3.96 d vs 4.02 d,P =0.875),incidence of bile leakage(9.3％ vs 0,P =0.060) and postoperative bleeding rate(5.1％ vs 2.2％,P =0.622) between these two groups.Conclusion Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration with primary closure of the common bile duct is an effective and safe procedure in acute cholangitis cases compared with T-tube drainage.