首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

Luminal A型和HER-2阳性乳腺癌的肿瘤干细胞生物学行为比较
引用本文:董华英|王伟|陈元文|包俊杰|陈鑫|吴诚义.Luminal A型和HER-2阳性乳腺癌的肿瘤干细胞生物学行为比较[J].中国普通外科杂志,2017,26(11):1431-1438.
作者姓名:董华英|王伟|陈元文|包俊杰|陈鑫|吴诚义
作者单位:(1. 海南省人民医院 乳腺外科|海南 海口 570311;2. 重庆医科大学附属第一医院 普通外科|重庆400016 )
基金项目:海南省卫生计生科教基金资助项目(02A2150014P1)。
摘    要:目的:比较人Luminal A型和HER-2阳性乳腺癌的肿瘤干细胞的生物学行为差异。方法:用Luminal A型和HER-2阳性乳腺癌组织培分离并培养原代乳腺癌细胞,获取富含肿瘤干细胞的微球体(MS);用胰酶将MS消化成单细胞(微球体细胞,MSDC),比较两类乳腺癌MSDC的体外增殖和自我更新能力、ALDH1+表型肿瘤干细胞含量,以及移植NOD/SCID小鼠后的成瘤情况。结果:Luminal A型和HER-2阳性乳腺癌组织分离的原代乳腺癌细胞均能培养出MS,但相对于Luminal A型乳腺癌,HER-2阳性乳腺癌来源的MS形成时间短,生成的MS体积大;HER-2阳性乳腺癌来源的MSDC无论在无血清或添加血清的培养基中的增殖与再生能力均明显强于Luminal A型乳腺癌来源的MSDC,且前者含ALDH1表型干细胞比例明显高于后者(均P0.05);HER-2阳性乳腺癌的MSDC在NOD/SCID小鼠体内成瘤能力也强于Luminal A型乳腺癌来源的MSDC。结论:Luminal A型和HER-2阳性乳腺癌分离出来肿瘤干细胞生物学行为存在明显的差异,两者可能有不同肿瘤干细胞起源。

关 键 词:乳腺肿瘤  肿瘤干细胞  微球体  受体,erbB-2
收稿时间:2017/8/4 0:00:00
修稿时间:2017/10/16 0:00:00

Comparison of biological behaviors in cancer stem cells derived from Luminal A and HER-2-positive breast cancer
DONG Huaying,WANG Wei,CHEN Yuanwen,BAO Junjie,CHEN Xin,WU Chengyi.Comparison of biological behaviors in cancer stem cells derived from Luminal A and HER-2-positive breast cancer[J].Chinese Journal of General Surgery,2017,26(11):1431-1438.
Authors:DONG Huaying  WANG Wei  CHEN Yuanwen  BAO Junjie  CHEN Xin  WU Chengyi
Institution:(1. Department of Breast Surgery, Hainan General Hospital, Haikou 570311, China|2. Department of General Surgery, the Frist Affiliated Hospital, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400016, China)
Abstract:Objective: To compare the difference in biological behaviors between two types of tumor stem cells derived from human Luminal A and HER-2-positive breast cancer. Methods: Primary breast cancer cells were isolated from specimens of Luminal A and HER-2-positive breast cancer tissues and cultured, and then the mammospheres (MSs) were obtained, which were highly enriched in tumor stem cells. MSs were dissociated into single cells (mammospheres-derived cells, MSDCs) by trypsin digestion, and then the proliferative and regenerative abilities in vitro, the proportions of ALDH1+ cell population, and the tumor formation abilities after inoculation into NOD/SCID mice were compared between MSDCs from the two types of breast cancer. Results: MSs formed in the primary cultured breast cancer cells either isolated from Luminal A or HER-2-positive breast cancer tissue. However, in HER-2-positive breast cancer, the MSs formation time was shorter and their volume was larger than those in Luminal A breast cancer. The proliferative and regenerative abilities in MSDCs from HER-2-positive breast cancer were significantly higher than those in MSDCs from Luminal A breast cancer either cultured in serum-free medium or medium containing serum, and the proportion of ALDH1+ cell population in the former was significantly higher than that in the latter (all P<0.05). The tumor formation ability of MSDCs from HER-2-positive breast cancer was stronger than that of MSDCs from Luminal A breast cancer in NOD/SCID mice. Conclusion: The tumor stem cells isolated from Luminal A and HER-2-positive breast cancer have significantly different biological behaviors. So the two types of breast cancer may originate from different tumor stem cells.
Keywords:Breast Neoplasms  Neoplastic Stem Cells  Microspheres  Receptor  ErbB-2
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国普通外科杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国普通外科杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号