首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的三种微创手术疗效分析
引用本文:王跃,曹沪春,陈启平,刘杰. 输尿管上段嵌顿性结石的三种微创手术疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 267-270. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.04.013
作者姓名:王跃  曹沪春  陈启平  刘杰
作者单位:1. 241000 安徽,芜湖市第一人民医院泌尿科
摘    要:目的比较经尿道输尿管镜碎石取石术(URL)、微创经皮肾镜碎石取石术(MPCNL)和后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石(RLU)三种微创手术处理输尿管上段嵌顿性结石疗效。 方法回顾性分析2013年12月至2017年12月在我院治疗的输尿管上段嵌顿性结石69例,其中URL组23例,MPCNL组26例,RLU组20例。 结果三组患者年龄、结石位置、结石大小、肾积水比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。三组手术时间、术后住院日分别为URL组(34±11)min、(3.2±2.5)d,MPCNL组(59±12)min、(5.5±2.2)d,RLU组(122±25)min、(8.3±2.1)d,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);三组手术成功率、1个月净石率分别为,URL组82.6%(19/23)、78.3%(18/23),MPCNL组100%(26/26)、100%(26/26),RLU组95%(19/20)、100%(20/20),URL与其余两组对比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论MPCNL具有手术时间短、成功率高、净石率高特点,治疗输尿管上段嵌顿性结石效果确切,若合并肾结石可作为首选治疗;URL不推荐作为输尿管上段结石首先治疗;RLU可作为输尿管上段嵌顿结石可选择性治疗。

关 键 词:输尿管结石  输尿管镜  经皮肾镜  腹腔镜  
收稿时间:2018-06-27

Effect of three kinds of minimally invasive surgery for treatment of impacted upper ureteric calculi
Yue Wang,Huchun Cao,Qiping Chen,Jie Liu. Effect of three kinds of minimally invasive surgery for treatment of impacted upper ureteric calculi[J]. , 2019, 13(4): 267-270. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3253.2019.04.013
Authors:Yue Wang  Huchun Cao  Qiping Chen  Jie Liu
Affiliation:1. Department of Urology, the First People's Hospital of Wuhu, Anhui 241000, China
Abstract:ObjectiveTo compare the effecacy of minimally invasive treatment of impacted upper ureteric calculi by transureteroscopic lithotripsy (URL), minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) and retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy (RLU). Methods69 cases of impacted upper ureteric calculi who were treated in our hospital from December 2013 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed, 23 cases were treated by URL, 26 cases by MPCNL and 20 cases by RLU. ResultsThere was no significant difference in age, stone position, stone size and hydronephrosis in the three groups (P>0.05). The operative time and postoperative hospital stay of the three groups were (34±11) min and (3.2±2.5) d in URL group, (59±12) min and (5.5±2.2) d in MPCNL group, (122±25) min and (8.3±2.1) d in RLU group, the difference were statistically significant between the three groups (P<0.05). The success rate and stone clearance rate of the three groups were 82.6% (19/23) and 78.3% (18/23) in URL group, 100% (26/26) and 100% (26/26) in MPCNL group, 95% (19/20) and 100% (20/20) in RLU group, the difference among URL and the other two groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). ConclusionsMPCNL has the characteristics of short operation time, high success rate and high stone clearance rate, which is effective in the treatment of incarcerated upper ureteral calculi, MPCNL can be the first choice of treatment if combined with renal calculi. URL is not recommended as the first treatment for upper ureteral calculi. RLU can be used as a selective treatment for upper ureteral calculi.
Keywords:Ureteric calculi  Ureteroscope  PCNL  Laparoscopy  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版)》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号