| 两种梅毒检测方法的比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙俊,刘美华,闫忠.两种梅毒检测方法的比较[J].检验医学与临床,2011,8(9):1039-1039,1041. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙俊 刘美华 闫忠 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南省周口市中医院,466000 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的 用CHEMCLIN(R)600全自动化学免疫发光仪(CLIA)法和梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验(TPPA)分别检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体,并对两种方法 进行方法 学评价.方法 将150例门诊确诊为梅毒患者的血清标本分别使用CLIA法与TPPA检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体,观察二者的敏感度及特异性.结果 150例血清标本中,CLIA法检测阳性148 例,阳性率为98.67%;TPPA法检测阳性144 例,阳性率为96.00%.结论 CLIA法检测梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体具有操作简便,结果 易于保存,敏感度优于TPPA法等特点,越来越广泛地得到临床的认可和应用.
|
| 关 键 词： | 全自动化学发光仪 梅毒 梅毒螺旋体特异性抗体 梅毒螺旋体明胶颗粒凝集试验 |
Comparison of the two methods on examing the syphilis |
| |
| SUN Jun,LIU Mei-hua,YAN Zhong.Comparison of the two methods on examing the syphilis[J].Laboratory Medicine and Clinic,2011,8(9):1039-1039,1041. |
| |
| Authors: | SUN Jun LIU Mei-hua YAN Zhong |
| |
| Institution: | SUN Jun,LIU Mei-hua,YAN Zhong(Zhoukou Hospital of TCM,Zhoukou,Henan 466000,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To evaluate two methodologies of CLIA and TPPA on examing the treponema pallidum specific antibody.Methods The serum specimens from 150 patients with syphilis were collected,then we tested the treponema pallidum specific antibody by CLIA and TPPA,respectively,and the sensitivity and specificity of the two methods on examing syphilis were observed.Results 148 out of 150 samples were tested positive by CLIA method,with a positive rate of 98.67%.While 144 out of 150 samples were tested positive by TP... |
| |
| Keywords: | CLIA syphilis treponema pallidum specific antibody TPPA |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
