首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

手术患者术中压力性损伤评估框架的构建研究
引用本文:王悦,刘春英,宋辉,李宏彬,王莉,肖华,彭玉娜,魏凯静.手术患者术中压力性损伤评估框架的构建研究[J].天津护理,2020,28(2):134.
作者姓名:王悦  刘春英  宋辉  李宏彬  王莉  肖华  彭玉娜  魏凯静
作者单位:(1. 天津医科大学肿瘤医院 国家肿瘤临床医学研究中心 天津市“肿瘤防治”重点实验室 天津市恶性肿瘤临床医学研究中心,天津300060;2.天津市第一中心医院; 3.天津医科大学总医院; 4.泰达国际心血管病医院)
基金项目:天津市护理学会面上科研课题(tjhlky20180108)
摘    要:目的:构建手术患者术中压力性损伤风险评估框架,为制定术中压力性损伤风险评估工具提供科学依据。方法:通过文献查询、现状调查和德尔菲函询法,对来自7个地区与压力性损伤研究相关的22名专家进行两轮函询。结果:手术患者术中压力性损伤风险评估内容,结构上包括术前风险评估阶段、术后风险评估阶段;内容包括患者固有因素7项、手术因素6项(术前为预计性评估、术后为实际性评价);本研究专家的可靠性及权威性较高,两轮专家函询有效回收率分别为100%、95.4%,专家的权威系数分别为0.801、0.832,专家的肯德尔和谐系数分别为0.335、0.458。结论:本研究初步构建了清点单式术中压力性损伤风险评估工具的框架,为临床术中压力性损伤风险评估工具的制订奠定了基础。

关 键 词:压力性损伤  风险评估  德尔菲  

A research of evaluation framework for intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing surgery
WANG Yue,LIU Chunying,SONG Hui,LI Hongbin,WANG Li,XIAO Hua,PENG Yuna,WEI Kaijing.A research of evaluation framework for intraoperative pressure injury in patients undergoing surgery[J].Tianjin Journal of Nursing,2020,28(2):134.
Authors:WANG Yue  LIU Chunying  SONG Hui  LI Hongbin  WANG Li  XIAO Hua  PENG Yuna  WEI Kaijing
Institution:(1.Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital,Tianjin 300060; 2.Tianjin First Central Hospital;3.The General Hospital of Tianjin medical University; 4.TEDA International Cardiovascular Hospital)
Abstract:Objective: Toconstructiona framework, and provide a scientific basis for the evaluation of intraoperative pressure injury in the patients undergoing the surgery. Methods: The framework was preliminarily formed through literatures review, clinical survey and Delphi method. 22 experts from the research fields related to stress injury were consulted twice.Results: The risk assessment framework had been constructed to include the preoperative and postoperative stages according to the assessment time; and 7 patient factors and 6 surgical factors in it(preoperative predictive evaluation and postoperative practical evaluation). The results of Delphi method showed a higher reliability and authority.The effective recovery rate of the two rounds of expert consultation were respectively 100%, 95.4%; and the authority coefficient were respectively 0.801, 0.832, and the Kendall coefficient of concordance were 0.335 and 0.458 respectively.Conclusion: In this study, the list framework of risk assessment was preliminarily established. It lays a foundation for the development of risk assessment tools for intraoperative pressure injury.
Keywords:Pressure injury  Risk assessment  Delphi method  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《天津护理》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《天津护理》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号