首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

不同取穴电针对腰椎间盘突出症腰椎功能的康复作用
引用本文:黄仕荣,詹红生,石印玉.不同取穴电针对腰椎间盘突出症腰椎功能的康复作用[J].中国康复医学杂志,2006,21(6):497-500.
作者姓名:黄仕荣  詹红生  石印玉
作者单位:上海中医药大学附属曙光医院骨伤科,上海市中医药研究院骨伤科研究所,上海,200021
摘    要:目的:探讨电针治疗腰椎间盘突出症的有效方法.方法:将全部入组98例患者随机分成治疗组(n=53)与对照组(n=45),采用改良Oswestry失能量表(ODI)对两组患者腰椎功能进行连续动态观测,治疗组采用局部单穴电针治疗,对照组采用常规取穴电针治疗,各组的电针参数与针刺频度一致.结果:首次治疗后两组ODI每次后续评分均较治疗前差异有显著性意义(P<0.001),且每个时间点两指标组间差异也分别具有显著性意义(P<0.001).结论:局部单穴电针疗法对腰椎间盘突出症较常规取穴电针有更好的临床疗效.

关 键 词:腰椎间盘突出症  电针疗法  腰椎功能
文章编号:1001-1242(2006)-06-0497-04
收稿时间:2005-09-22
修稿时间:2005年9月22日

Clinical lumbar function-recovering effect of different electroacupuncture points on lumbar intervertebral disc herniation
HUANG Shirong,ZHAN Hongsheng,SHI Yinyu.Clinical lumbar function-recovering effect of different electroacupuncture points on lumbar intervertebral disc herniation[J].China Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine,2006,21(6):497-500.
Authors:HUANG Shirong  ZHAN Hongsheng  SHI Yinyu
Institution:HUANG Shirong,ZHAN Hongsheng,SHI Yinyu Department of Orthopedics & Traumatology,Shuguang Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of TCM,Institute of Orthopedics & Traumatology Affiliated to Shanghai Academy of TCM,Shanghai
Abstract:Objective:To search for an effective therapy for the treatment of lumbar intervertebral disc herniation (LIDH).Method:All 98 cases of LIDH patients were randomly divided into treatment group(n=53) who were treated with local single-point electroacupuncture stimulation(SPEAS) and control group(n=45) which was treated with conventional electroacupuncture stimulation(CEAS). The lumbar disability index of each group was continuously evaluated with ODI before every treatment and 2 days after the 8th treatment(9 times altogether). SPEAS and CEAS subjects were treated with the same time interval, intensity and acupuncture frequency. Result:The dynamic evaluation results of ODI presented significant differences than the baseline(P<0.01) and significant differences between the early and delayed treatment(P<0.001) in the two groups. However, the changing range of the observation index of SPEAS group was more significant than that in the CEAS control group(P<0.001) at the same time interval. Conclusion:SPEAS is more effective than CEAS in the treatment of LIDH.
Keywords:lumbar intervertebral disc herniation  electroacupuncture therapy  lumbar function
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国康复医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国康复医学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号