首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较分析
引用本文:方孙阳,俞学军,董怡民,罗衡桂.开腹阑尾切除术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较分析[J].全科医学临床与教育,2006,4(2):113-115.
作者姓名:方孙阳  俞学军  董怡民  罗衡桂
作者单位:312030,浙江绍兴,中国医科大学绍兴华宇医院普外科
摘    要:目的探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术(laparoscopic appendectomy,LC)与开腹阑尾切除术(open appendectomv OA)的优缺点。方法回顾分析2004年3月至2005年3月53例腹腔镜阑尾切除术,与同期施行的77例开腹阑尾切除术的手术情况,并对其临床资料进行统计、对比、分析。结果LA与OA的手术时间无明显差异,LA术后疼痛程度、术后住院时间、术后切口感染率等方面明显优于OA,P〈0.05。结论LA是安全可行的,与OA相比,具有创伤小,恢复快,并发症少和住院时间短的优势,可作为治疗急慢性阑尾炎的首选手术方式。

关 键 词:腹腔镜阑尾切除术  开腹阑尾切除术  对比分析
收稿时间:2005-11-21
修稿时间:2005年11月21

Contrastive analysis between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy
FANG Sunyang,YU Xuejun,DONG Yimin,LUO Hengui.Contrastive analysis between open appendectomy and laparoscopic appendectomy[J].clinical education of general practice,2006,4(2):113-115.
Authors:FANG Sunyang  YU Xuejun  DONG Yimin  LUO Hengui
Abstract:Objective To explore the merits and defects of LA and OA. Methods Fifty three cases of LA and 77 cases of OA were performed during March 2004 to March 2005. The clinical data of two methods were summarized and contrasted. Results There was no deference between two methods in the mean operative time,LA patients had less postoperative pain, less average length of stay and rate of incision injection than OA, Conclusions LA is safe and feasible. It has the advantages of less invasion, quick recovery and shorter hospitalization.
Keywords:laparoscopic appendectomy  open appendectomy  contrastive analysis
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号