首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

肝硬化伴肝性脑病与血清IL-6表达水平相关性的meta分析
引用本文:刘昌贺,,李 衡,徐圣杰,郭晶晶,吴清华,.肝硬化伴肝性脑病与血清IL-6表达水平相关性的meta分析[J].现代检验医学杂志,2022,0(3):56-61.
作者姓名:刘昌贺    李 衡  徐圣杰  郭晶晶  吴清华  
作者单位:(1. 贵州医科大学, 贵阳 550004;2. 江南大学附属医院, 江苏无锡 214062;3. 南通大学医学院, 江苏南通 226001)
摘    要:目的 评价肝硬化伴肝性脑病( hepatic encephalopathy,HE)与血清白细胞介素 -6(serum interleukin-6, sIL-6)水平表达的关系。方法 计算机检索中国生物医学文献( CBM)、知网( CNKI)、维普 (VIP)、万方 (WAN FANG),PubMed,Embase,Web of Science和 Cochrane Library数据库,搜集肝硬化患者中关于 sIL-6水平与 HE相关的病例对照研究,检索时间均为建库至 2021年 4月。根据纳入和排除标准,最终纳入 13个研究,包括 1 479例研究对象,采用 Review Manager Version 5.3进行 meta分析。结果 sIL-6的含量在肝硬化伴 HE组与肝硬化无 HE组比较 SMD=1.29,95%CI(0.51,2.08),P=0.001],肝硬化伴显性肝性脑病( overt hepatic encephalopathy,OHE)组与肝硬化无 HE组比较 SMD=2.77,95%CI(1.64,3.89),P< 0.000 01],肝硬化伴轻微肝性脑病( minimal hepatic encephalopathy, MHE)组与肝硬化无 HE组比较 SMD=2.82,95%CI(1.05,4.58),P=0.002],肝硬化伴 OHE与肝硬化伴 MHE组比较 SMD=1.82,95%CI(1.30,2.33),P< 0.000 01],肝硬化伴Ⅲ~Ⅳ级 HE组与肝硬化伴Ⅰ~Ⅱ级 HE组比较 SMD=0.95,95%CI(0.52,1.37),P< 0.000 1],肝硬化伴 MHE与健康对照组比较 SMD=4.32,95%CI(2.86,5.77), P< 0.000 01],肝硬化无 HE组与健康对照组比较 SMD=2.23,95%CI(1.34,3.12),P< 0.000 01],差异均有统计学意义。结论 sIL-6的表达水平可能与肝性脑病的发病机制有关,有望成为诊断肝性脑病及判定预后疗效的重要炎症指标,还需要更多高质量、多中心的研究验证。

关 键 词:血清白细胞介素-6  肝硬化  肝性脑病  Meta  分析

Meta Analysis of the Correlation between Serum Interleukin-6 and Hepatic Encephalopathy in Liver Cirrhosis
LIU Chang-he,,LI Heng,XU Sheng-jie,GUO Jing-jing,WU Qing-hua,.Meta Analysis of the Correlation between Serum Interleukin-6 and Hepatic Encephalopathy in Liver Cirrhosis[J].Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine,2022,0(3):56-61.
Authors:LIU Chang-he    LI Heng  XU Sheng-jie  GUO Jing-jing  WU Qing-hua  
Institution:(1. Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang 550004, China;2. Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University, Jiangsu Wuxi 214062, China;3.Medical College of Nantong University, Jiangshu Nantong 226001,China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the relationship between Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) and serum interleukin-6 (sIL-6) in liver cirrhosis. Methods Computer retrieval of CBM, CNKI, VIP, WanFang, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library database were conducted to retrieve case-control studies related to sIL-6 level and HE. The retrieval time was from the establishment of the database to April 2021. According to inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 studies were included, including 1 479 subjects, and meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager Version 5.3. Results The levels of sIL-6 were compared between liver cirrhosis with HE group and liver cirrhosis without HE groupSMD=1.29, 95%CI(0.51,2.08), P=0.001]. Comparison between cirrhosis with OHE group and cirrhosis without HE groupSMD=2.77, 95%CI(1.64,3.89), P < 0.000 01]. Comparison of cirrhosis with MHE group and cirrhosis without HE groupSMD=2.82, 95%CI(1.05,4.58), P=0.002]. Cirrhosis with OHE group and cirrhosis with MHE groupSMD=1.82,95%CI(1.30, 2.33), P < 0.000 01]. Comparison of cirrhosis with grade Ⅲ~Ⅳ HE group and cirrhosis with grade Ⅰ~Ⅱ HE groupSMD=0.95,95%CI(0.52,1.37), P < 0.000 1]. Comparison of cirrhosis with MHE group and Healthy control groupSMD=4.32, 95%CI(2.86,5.77), P < 0.000 01]. Comparison of liver cirrhosis without HE group and healthy control groupSMD=2.23, 95%CI(1.34,3.12), P < 0.000 01], the differences among the above groups were statistically significant. Conclusion The increase of sIL-6 may be related to the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy. It is expected to be an important inflammatory indicator for diagnosing hepatic encephalopathy and determining its prognosis. However, more high-quality and multi-center studies are needed to verify the level of sIL-6.
Keywords:
点击此处可从《现代检验医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《现代检验医学杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号