qSOFA评分对急性上消化道出血病情严重程度的预测价值

目的:评估快速序贯器官衰竭(qSOFA)评分对急性上消化道出血病情严重程度的预测价值,并与Glasgow Blatchford评分(GBS)和内镜检查前的Rockall评分(pRS)的预测价值进行比较。方法:回顾性选取河北大学附属医院急诊科收治的917例急性上消化道出血患者,收集所有患者的临床资料,将需要进行输血治疗、再出血、重症监护及入院28 d内死亡定义为不良结局,表示患者病情严重,并据此分为无不良结局组(409例)和不良结局组(508例)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析GBS、pRS和qSOFA评分对急性上消化道出血患者不良结局的预测价值,并计算敏感度、特异度及截断值等参数。结果:2组患者的年龄、性别、呼吸频率、是否伴黑便、呕吐咖啡样物等指标比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);收缩压、心率、血尿素氮、血红蛋白、伴呕血、晕厥、意识状态改变及合并症等指标比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。GBS、pRS和qSOFA评分预测急性上消化道出血不良结局的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.681、0.626和0.648,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:GBS、pRS和qSOFA评分均能预测急性上消化道出血的病情严重程度,而qSOFA评分更简单方便,可以用来评估急性上消化道出血的病情严重程度。

Value of qSOFA score in predicting the severity of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding

Objective: To evaluate the predictive value of quick sequential organ failure assessment(qSOFA) score on the severity of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, and to compare with the predictive value of Glasgow-Blatchford score(GBS) and pre-endoscopic Rockall score(pRS). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 917 patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the Emergency Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, and clinical data were collected. Patients who underwent blood transfusion treatment, rebleeding, intensive care and death within 28 days of admission were included in the adverse outcome group, and the remaining patients were included in the group without adverse outcomes, and the predictive value of GBS, pRS and qSOFA score on adverse outcomes was analyzed and compared. The predictable value of GBS, pRS and qSOFA score for adverse outcomes in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding was analyzed using the receiver operator characteristic(ROC) curve, and the sensitivity, specificity and truncation values were calculated. Results: There was no statistical significance(P>0.05) in the two groups of patients in comparing the indicators of age, sex, respiratory rate, whether they were accompanied by melaena and vomiting of coffee ground-like content;and the systolic blood pressure, heart rate, blood urea nitrogen, hemoglobin, concomitant hematemesis, syncope, altered state of consciousness and comorbidities were compared, and the differences were statistically significant(P<0.05). The area under the ROC curve predicting the adverse outcome of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding was 0.681, 0.626 and 0.648, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). Conclusion: GBS, pRS and qSOFA score can predict the severity of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, while qSOFA score is simpler and more convenient and can be used to assess the severity of acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.