首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

基于RIGHT康复临床实践指南报告质量研究
引用本文:王子君,王玲,玉炫,周奇,史乾灵,赵思雅,荀杨芹,张先卓,杨楠,石秀娥,陈耀龙,杨克虎.基于RIGHT康复临床实践指南报告质量研究[J].中国康复理论与实践,2020,26(2):161-169.
作者姓名:王子君  王玲  玉炫  周奇  史乾灵  赵思雅  荀杨芹  张先卓  杨楠  石秀娥  陈耀龙  杨克虎
作者单位:1.兰州大学基础医学院循证医学中心,甘肃兰州市 7300002.世界卫生组织指南实施与知识转化合作中心,甘肃兰州市 7300003.GRADE中国中心,甘肃兰州市 7300004.甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室,甘肃兰州市 7300005.兰州大学公共卫生学院,甘肃兰州市 7300006.兰州大学第一临床医学院,甘肃兰州市 7300007.甘肃省康复中心医院,甘肃兰州市 7300008.甘肃省循证康复医学研究中心,甘肃兰州市 730000
基金项目:国家社科基金重大项目(No.19ZDA142);甘肃省循证医学与临床转化重点实验室创新基金项目(No.CXJJ2019002)~~
摘    要:目的 评价康复临床实践指南的报告质量。方法 检索PubMed、EMBASE、CNKI、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)和万方等数据库以及指南相关网站的康复临床实践指南,检索时限均为2017年1月1日至2020年1月11日。由2名研究人员独立筛选文献并交叉核对,基于RIGHT清单对康复领域指南进行报告质量研究。结果 最终纳入16篇指南,平均报告率为(44.8±27.9)%。其中指南在领域一基本信息方面(57.3%)报告率最高,领域三证据(31.3%)和领域七其他方面(31.3%)报告率最低。国内发表的指南平均报告率低于国外(OR = 0.80, 95%CI 0.56~1.16),初始版的指南平均报告率低于更新版(OR = 0.79, 95%CI 0.54~1.16),由学会/协会制订的指南平均报告率高于非学会/协会制订的指南(OR = 1.15, 95%CI 0.82~1.61),但均无显著性差异。结论 国内外康复临床实践指南的报告质量整体有待提高。建议未来康复指南制订者严格按照RIGHT标准规范化撰写指南内容,充分报告指南关键信息和内容,提升康复指南报告的有效性。

关 键 词:康复医学  临床实践指南  RIGHT  报告质量  
收稿时间:2020-02-02

Report Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines of Rehabilitation Based on RIGHT
WANG Zi-jun,WANG Ling,YU Xuan,ZHOU Qi,SHI Qian-ling,ZHAO Si-ya,XUN Yang-qin,ZHANG Xian-zhuo,YANG Nan,SHI Xiu-e,CHEN Yao-long,YANG Ke-hu.Report Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines of Rehabilitation Based on RIGHT[J].Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Theory and Practice,2020,26(2):161-169.
Authors:WANG Zi-jun  WANG Ling  YU Xuan  ZHOU Qi  SHI Qian-ling  ZHAO Si-ya  XUN Yang-qin  ZHANG Xian-zhuo  YANG Nan  SHI Xiu-e  CHEN Yao-long  YANG Ke-hu
Institution:(Evidence-based Medicine Center,School of Basic Medical Sciences,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;WHO Collaborating Centre for Guideline Implementation and Knowledge Translation,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;Chinese GRADE Center,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;Key Laboratory of Evidence-based Medicine and Clinical Transformation of Gansu Province,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;School of Public Health,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;the First School of Clinical Medicine,Lanzhou University,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;Rehabilitation Center Hospital of Gansu,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China;Gansu Evidence-based Rehabilitation Medical Research Center,Lanzhou,Gansu 730000,China)
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the quality of reporting of clinical practice guidelines of rehabilitation.Methods A comprehensive retrieve was performed in electronic databases of PubMed,EMBASE,CNKI,China Biology Medicine disc,Wanfang data,etc.,from January 1,2017 to January 11,2020.Supplementary searches had been done on relevant websites.Two researchers reviewed literatures and assessed the reporting quality independently by using Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare(RIGHT),and any disagreements needed to be discussed in a consensus meeting.Results A total of 16 guidelines were included,with an average reporting rate of(44.8±27.9)%.Among the seven domains of RIGHT,basic information was reported the highest(57.3%),and evidence(31.3%)and other information(31.3%)was the lowest.The reporting rate was less as the guidelines published in China than in foreign contries(OR=0.80,95%CI 0.56-1.16),in original version than in update version(OR=0.79,95%CI 0.54-1.16);and higher as developed by various societies or associations than developed by non-societies or associations(OR=1.15,95%CI 0.82-1.61),however,no statistically significant difference was found in above comparisons.Conclusion Current clinical practice guidelines of rehabilitation reported with low quality.It is proposed that future guideline developers should report guidelines after RIGHT statements,including key information and content,in order to improve the quality of reporting guidelines.
Keywords:rehabilitation medicine  clinical practice guidelines  Reporting Items for Practice Guidelines in Healthcare  quality of reporting
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国康复理论与实践》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国康复理论与实践》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号