屈肘肩顶法与手牵足蹬法治疗肩关节脱位的疗效分析

目的：比较屈肘肩顶法与手牵足蹬法对于复位肩关节脱位的疗效。方法2012年1月-2012年12月，共治疗肩关节前脱位72例，常规运用了两种手法复位治疗方法，将其分为两组，分别采用屈肘肩顶法（n=36）和手牵足蹬法（n=36）复位。结果采用屈肘肩顶法有6例首次复位失败，采用手牵足蹬法有10例首次复位失败，最终所有患者肩关节功能恢复佳。2组治疗方法比较，屈肘肩顶法较手牵足蹬法复位效率更高，但肩关节功能和活动度恢复无明显差别。结论屈肘肩顶法和手牵足蹬法治疗肩关节前脱位均可获得较好的肩关节功能和活动度，而屈肘肩顶法在复位成功率方面具有优越性，值得临床推广。

Efficacy Analysis of Elbow Flexion and Shoulder Squaring Method as well as Hand Pulling and Foot Pedaling Method on Shoulder Joint Dislocation

Objective To compare the two methods of shoulder joint dislocation therapy as elbow flexion and shoulder squaring, and the therapy of hand pulling and foot pedaling. Methods By two conservative therapies, we treated 72 patients with shoulder joint dislocation who were divided into two groups as 36 patients taking elbow flexion and shoulder squaring method and 36 patients taking hand pulling and foot pedaling method from January to December in 2012. Results There were 6 patients with failure of restoration of shoulder dislocation by first time through elbow flexion and shoulder squaring method, and 10 patients through hand pulling and foot pedaling. Finally, shoulder joints of all patients got well. Hand pulling and foot pedaling method was better than elbow flexion and shoulder squaring method by comparing on restoration of shoulder joint dislocation, but no significant differences on shoulder function and action. Conclusion Either elbow flexion and shoulder squaring or hand pulling and foot pedaling has good shoulder joint function and action. But elbow flexion and shoulder squaring method is superior in restoration of shoulder joint dislocation, which is worth to popularization.