首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

锁骨骨折三种内固定方法的生物力学性能比较
引用本文:胡庆丰,周辉,潘浩,王以进.锁骨骨折三种内固定方法的生物力学性能比较[J].医用生物力学,2004,19(3):176-179.
作者姓名:胡庆丰  周辉  潘浩  王以进
作者单位:杭州市中医院骨伤科 浙江杭州310007 (胡庆丰,周辉,潘浩),上海大学生物力学工程研究所 上海201800(王以进)
摘    要:目的 探讨新研制的防滑锁骨钉在锁骨骨折内固定中的生物力学性能 ,并与传统的 4孔钢板和克氏针内固定方法进行比较 ,为临床应用提供科学依据。方法 采集 9具成人新鲜锁骨标本 ,行中外 1/ 3处锁骨骨折模型 ,分别采用防滑锁骨钉 (PSCN) ,4孔钢板 (4SP)和克氏针 (KP)三种内固定方法固定 ,运用实验应力分析手段测试各组试件的生物力学特性 ,并进行比较。另设正常锁骨标本组以作对照。结果  (1)三点弯曲强度测量 ,4SP和PSCN组均接近正常标本 (P >0 0 5 ) ,而KP组与正常标本组相差显著 (P <0 0 5 ) ;弯曲刚度测量结果具有相似的规律性。(2 )扭转强度和刚度测量表明 ,4SP和PSCN与正常标本无显著性差异 ,而比KP固定来得优越 (P <0 0 5 )。 (3)拉伸试验表明 ,4SP和PSCN内固定抗拉强度和刚度优于KP内固定 (P <0 0 5 ) ;抗拔力PSCN明显优于KP内固定 (P <0 0 5 )。 (4 )PSCN内固定应力遮挡小 ,明显优于 4SP(P <0 0 5 )。结论 PSCN在强度和刚度上均明显优于KP内固定 ,与 4SP相接近 ,且应力遮挡小 ,是当前锁骨内固定的理想固定方法

关 键 词:锁骨骨折  内固定  生物力学
文章编号:1004-7220(2004)03-0176-05

A Biomechanical Study of a New Fracture Clavicle Internal-Fixator and Compared with Three Instruments
HU Qing-feng,ZHOU Hui,PAN Hao,WANG Yi-jin..A Biomechanical Study of a New Fracture Clavicle Internal-Fixator and Compared with Three Instruments[J].Journal of Medical Biomechanics,2004,19(3):176-179.
Authors:HU Qing-feng  ZHOU Hui  PAN Hao  WANG Yi-jin
Institution:HU Qing-feng,ZHOU Hui,PAN Hao,WANG Yi-jin2.
Abstract:Objective To study the biomechanical characteristics of a new preventslide clavicular nail for treatment of clavicular fracture. This study was made to provide some biomechanical evidences for better clinical operation. Methods 9 adult clavicles were divided into 3 groups randomly, and made a model for the middle and lateral fractures. Those 3 groups was fixed with prevent-slide clavicular nail(PSCN), 4 holes steel plate(4SP) or kirschner's pin(KP), respectively. The biomechanical test was performed and the stress was analyzed. Results (1)Bending strength of internal fixation with 4SP and PSCN were close to normal specimen group(NS) (P>0.05);but KP group was less than normal specimen group (P<0.05).(2) Torsional strength and stiffness of internal fixation with 4SP and PSCN were less than NS group,but more than KP group (P<0.05).(3) Anti-putout strength and stiffness of internal fixation 4SP and PSCN were larger than KP group (P<0.05); Anti-putout power of internal fixation with PSCN were larger than KP group (P<0.05).(4) Stress shielding of internal fixation with PSCP were less than 4SP group (P<0.05). Conclusion The strength and stiffness of PSCN was larger than that of KP,and was close to 4SP.The stress shielding of PSCN was the less.The internal fixation with PSCN is an ideal method for treating clavicular fracture.
Keywords:Clavicle fracture  Internal fixation  Biomechanics
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《医用生物力学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医用生物力学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号