首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

复合性国际诊断交谈表3.0中文版在社区应用的信效度评价
引用本文:黄悦勤,谢守付,卢瑾,许俊亭,党卫民,李奕,刘肇瑞,迟锐.复合性国际诊断交谈表3.0中文版在社区应用的信效度评价[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2010,24(1).
作者姓名:黄悦勤  谢守付  卢瑾  许俊亭  党卫民  李奕  刘肇瑞  迟锐
作者单位:1. 北京大学精神卫生研究所,卫生部精神卫生学重点实验室(北京大学),北京100191
2. 大连市第七人民医院,大连,116023
摘    要:目的:采用以社区为基础的研究方法评价世界卫生组织复合性国际诊断交谈表(CIDI-3.0)中文版信度和效度。方法:以大连市精神障碍流行病学调查的社区中202名居民为研究对象,其中经美国精神障碍诊断与统计手册第四版(DSM-Ⅳ)确诊为心境障碍、焦虑障碍、精神分裂症和精神病性障碍共102人为患者组,其余100人为对照组,进行CIDI-3.0访谈以评价效标效度。同时进行CIDI-3.0的调查员一致性及重测信度检查。结果:(1)问卷筛查部分的灵敏度为60.4%~93.1%,特异度为33.6%~92.7%,阳性预测值为60.1%~95.1%,阴性预测值为68.1%~93.7%;(2)问卷各病种诊断部分的特异度为97.1%~98.9%,灵敏度为33.3%~70.3%,阳性预测值为66.7%~95.7%,阴性预测值为87.7%~95.4%;(3)调查员对各类精神障碍阳性诊断一致性的Kappa为值0.78;(4)重测信度kappa值从0.737~1.0。结论:复合性国际诊断交谈表3.0中文版有较好的效标效度和满意的重测信度,筛查部分具有高灵敏度,诊断部分具有高特异度,可以作为精神障碍流行病学研究的筛查和诊断工具。

关 键 词:复合性国际诊断交谈表  轴Ⅰ障碍用临床定式检查  信度  效度  精神障碍

Community-based evaluation of the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0
HUANY Yue-Qin,XIE Shou-Fu,LU Jin,Xu Jun-Ting,DANG Wei-Min,LI Yi,LIU Zhao-Rui,CHI Rui.Community-based evaluation of the reliability and validity of Chinese version of Composite International Diagnostic Interview-3.0[J].Chinese Mental Health Journal,2010,24(1).
Authors:HUANY Yue-Qin  XIE Shou-Fu  LU Jin  Xu Jun-Ting  DANG Wei-Min  LI Yi  LIU Zhao-Rui  CHI Rui
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the test-retest reliability and validity of Chinese version of World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview version 3.0(CIDI-3.0)by community-based study.Methods:Among 202 subjects from Dalian city,with the clinician-administered Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV(SCID),102 patents were diagnostic as mood disorder,anxiety disorder,schizophrenia or psychotic disorder and so on.All of the patients and the other 100 subjects without mental disorders as the control group were interviewed blindly by CIDI-3.0 to test the validity of CIDI-3.0.Ten patients among them were interviewed twice independently in a 7-day interval to evaluate the reliability of CIDI-3.0.Results:(1)For the screen section,the sensitivity values of different mental disorders ranged from 60.4% to 93.1%,while the specificity values from 33.6% to 92.7%.The positive predictive values were from 60.1% to 95.1%,and the negative predictive values were from 68.1% to 93.7%.(2)For different mental disorders,the specificity values ranged from 97.1% to 98.9%,while the sensitivity values were from 33.3% to 70.3%.Positive predict values were from 66.7% to 95.7%,and negative predictive values were from 87.7% to 95.4%.(3)The consistency was 0.78 in any mental disorder.(4)For test-retest reliability,kappa values ranged from 0.737 to 1.0.Conclusion:By clinical reappraisal,the Chinese version of CIDI-3.0 has satisfied validity and reliability.The screen section has high sensitivity,while the diagnostic sections have high specificities.That indicates that CIDI-3.0 is acceptable as a validated instrument for community survey on mental disorders.
Keywords:the Composite International Diagnostic Interview  Stru ctured Chlinical Interview for Diagnosis  reliability  validity  mental disorder
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号