抑郁症患者焦虑症状、应付方式与人格的相关研究

目的：探讨有无焦虑症状抑郁症患者的应付方式与人格的关系。方法：对88名抑郁症患者及与之匹配的90名正常对照组进行SDS、SAS、EPQ和应付方式问卷评定。结果：与正常对照组相比，抑郁症患者SDS、SAS、EPQ的N、P两个维度的得分高于正常对照组，而EPQ的E维度、积极应付方式得分低于对照组。相对于无焦虑症状组，有焦虑症状组SDS、SAS、EPQ的N、P两个维度的得分明显较高，积极应付方式得分明显较低。相关、回归分析表明抑郁症状的严重程度与SAS、EPQ的E维度及积极应付方式的关系更为密切，三者可解释抑郁症状严重程度方差的52．0％。结论：抑郁症患者发病期有较高的N、P两个维度的得分，较低的E维度得分，较少采用积极的应付方式。相对于无焦虑症状组，有焦虑症状组的抑郁症患者抑郁症状较严重，神经质、精神质比较明显，较少采用积极的应付方式。且较少采用积极的应付方式似乎可纳入人格特质的E维度之中。

Anxiety and its Relation to Coping Styles and Personality in Patients with Major Depression

Objective:To explore the relation among depression, anxiety, coping styles and personality in patients with major depression.Method:88 patients with major depression were assessed on admission. The assessments included Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS), Self-Rating Anxiety Scale(SAS),Eysenck Personality Questionnaire and Coping Styles Questionnaire. Nighty normal controls were assessed with the same instruments too.Results:The patients were found having higher scores in Neuroticism and Psychoticism, and lower scores in Extroversion and positive coping styles than normal controls.Higher scores in SDS, SAS, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism, and lower scores in positive coping styles, were found in the patients with anxiety. Significant relationship was found among depression, SAS, Extroversion, and positive coping styles.The last three accounted for 52.0% of the variance of depression.Conclusion:The patients with major depression have high scores in Neuroticism and Psychoticism, and low in Extroversion and positive coping styles.Those with anxiety scored even higher in SDS, SAS, Neuroticism, and Psychoticism, and lower in positive coping styles.The application of little positwe coping styles moy be a part of Extrovision in major depresion.