首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

双环钢丝捆扎技术联合关节置换对转子间骨折患者快速康复的临床观察
引用本文:付炯,尹良军,付廷,舒科杰,张平. 双环钢丝捆扎技术联合关节置换对转子间骨折患者快速康复的临床观察[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2016, 26(12): 73-77
作者姓名:付炯  尹良军  付廷  舒科杰  张平
作者单位:重庆医科大学附属第二医院 骨科,重庆 400010
摘    要:

目的  探讨交叉双环钢丝捆扎技术联合关节置换术治疗高龄股骨转子间粉碎骨折的临床疗效。方法选取本院2013~2014年行人工关节置换结合钢丝捆扎治疗转子间骨折(Evans-Jensen分型:Ⅲ型、Ⅵ型)病例进行回顾性分析,其中15例采用双环钢丝捆扎加人工关节置换术,19例采用普通环形钢丝捆扎加人工关节置换术。两组分别比较住院时间、首次行走时间、术前术后记录每日睡眠时间、每日饮食量、精神状态、髋关节Harris评分、血红蛋白、白蛋白、电解质、是否有关节脱位、呼吸及泌尿系统炎症等疾病,并进行对比分析。结果  采用交叉双环钢丝捆扎组与采用普通钢丝捆扎组比较,前者术后下床时间、住院天数及术后首月髋关节Harris评分优于后者(P <0.05),两者血液指标出院前后无明显差异(P >0.05),但前者恢复速度较后者更快(P <0.05),两组术后第3个月、第6个月及1年髋关节Harris功能评分差异无统计学意义(P >0.05)。结论  交叉双环钢丝捆扎加人工关节置换术能促进患者术后快速康复,减少住院时间,提高患髋近期功能,在患者术后快速恢复方面有积极作用。



关 键 词:

老年患者;股骨转子间骨折;人工关节置换术;交叉双环钢丝;快速康复

收稿时间:2016-01-12

Comparision of clinical curative effect of two different wire binding technologies artificial joint replacement for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures
Jiong Fu,Liang-jun Yin,Ting Fu,Ke-jie Shu,Ping Zhang. Comparision of clinical curative effect of two different wire binding technologies artificial joint replacement for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures[J]. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 2016, 26(12): 73-77
Authors:Jiong Fu  Liang-jun Yin  Ting Fu  Ke-jie Shu  Ping Zhang
Affiliation:Department of Orthopaedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 400010, China
Abstract:

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical curative effect of two different wire binding technologies combined with artificial joint replacement for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Methods Retrospectively analyzed 34 cases of elderly patients with femoral Intertrochanteric fractures treated with different wire binding technologies combined with artificial joint replacement in our hospital from 2013 to 2014. A number of 15 cases used double loop wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement (group 1), and 19 cases used ordinary wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement (group 2). Indexes indicated the recovery situation of two groups were comparative analyzed. Results Compared with the group 1, the group 2 had significantly extended  postoperative first walking time, postoperative hospital stays, and the Harris scoring of patients after surgery 1 month (P < 0.05). But the two groups had no difference in the harrisscoring of patients after surgery 3 month, 6 month, and 1 year (P > 0.05). The blood test index of the two groups had no difference either (P > 0.05). Conclusions Compared with the group used ordinary wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement, the group used double loop wire binding technology combined with artificial joint replacement can promote a faster recovery process, and reduce postoperative hospital stay time, and improve the hip joint''s function in short term.

Keywords:

elderly patient   intertrochanteric fracture   replacement   double loop wire   fast recovery

点击此处可从《中国现代医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国现代医学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号