首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

团体心理治疗对躯体形式障碍患者的影响
引用本文:龚建兵,吴传东,刘向华. 团体心理治疗对躯体形式障碍患者的影响[J]. 中国现代医学杂志, 2017, 27(23): 57-60
作者姓名:龚建兵  吴传东  刘向华
作者单位:1.海南省儋州市农垦那大医院精神病科,海南儋州571700;2.海南省安宁医院心理科,海南海口570100
基金项目:海南省医学科研基金资助项目(No:1421320.57A2004)
摘    要:
目的探讨团队心理治疗对躯体形式障碍患者早期干预的疗效。方法选取2014 年10 月-2015 年1 月海南省儋州市农垦那大医院收治的躯体形式障碍患者97 例,依据随机数表法分为A 组(团体心理治疗32例)、B 组(药物治疗33 例)、C 组(团队心理治疗+ 药物治疗32 例),比较3 组患者的临床疗效和躯体形式症状筛查量表(SOMS-7)、大体评定量表(GAS)及汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分。结果A组显效率为62.50%,好转率为81.25%;B 组显效率为63.64%,好转率为84.85%;C 组显效率为87.50%,好转率为96.88%,组间比较,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05),C 组患者的显效率和好转率高于A、B 组。治疗前,3 组患者的SOMS-7 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。治疗后48 周,A 组、B 组及C 组的SOMS-7 评分为(10.44±2.17)、(10.72±2.11)和(6.75±2.09)分,经方差分析,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。C 组的SOMS-7 评分低于A、B组。治疗前,3 组患者的GAS 评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。治疗后48 周,A 组、B 组及C 组的GAS 评分为(76.18±5.44)、(77.29±5.19)和(84.25±5.91)分,经检验,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05)。C 组的GAS 评分高于A、B组。3 组患者的HAMD评分比较,差异无统计学意义(p >0.05)。治疗后48 周3 组患者的HAMD 评分比较,差异有统计学意义(p <0.05),C组患者的HAMD评分低于A、B组。结论团体心理治疗联合药物使用在治疗躯体形式障碍方面成效好,能够改善患者精神状况及临床症状。

关 键 词:团体心理治疗;躯体形式障碍;干预;疗效
收稿时间:2016-10-27

Effect of group psychotherapy on somatoform disorders
Jian-bing Gong,Chuan-dong Wu,Xiang-hua Liu. Effect of group psychotherapy on somatoform disorders[J]. China Journal of Modern Medicine, 2017, 27(23): 57-60
Authors:Jian-bing Gong  Chuan-dong Wu  Xiang-hua Liu
Affiliation:1. Department of Psychiatry, Danzhou Agricultural Reclamation Nada Hospital, Danzhou,Hainan 571700, China; 2. Department of Psychology, Hainan ProvincialAnning Hospital, Haikou, Hainan 570100, China
Abstract:
Objective To evaluate the efficacy of team psychotherapy for early intervention of somatoform disorders. Methods According to a random number, 97 patients with somatoform disorders treated in DanzhouAgricultural Reclamation Nada Hospital from October 2014 to January 2015 were assigned into group A (32 cases who received team psychotherapy), group B (33 cases who received medication) and group C (32 cases who received both team psychotherapy and medication). The clinical efficacy, Somatoform Symptoms Screening Scale (Chinese version SOMS-7) score, Global Assessment Scale (GAS) score and Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) score were campared among the three groups. Results In the group A, the effective rate was 62.50%, the improvement rate was 81.25%; in the group B, the effective rate was 63.64%, the improvement rate was 84.85%; in the group C, the effective rate was 87.50%, the improvement rate was 96.88%, the effective rate and the improvement rate of the group C were higher than those of the groups A and B (p <0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the SOMS-7 score among the three groups (p >0.05). In the 48th week after treatment, the SOMS-7 score of the groups A, B and C was (10.44 ±2.17),(10.72 ±2.11) and (6.75 ±2.09) respectively; the SOMS-7 score of the group C was lower than that of the group A and the group B (p < 0.05). Before treatment, there were no significant differences in the GAS score among the three groups (p > 0.05). In the 48th week after treatment, the GAS score of the groups A, B and C was (76.18 ±5.44), (77.29 ±5.19) and (84.25 ±5.91) respectively; the GAS score of the group C was higher than that of the group A and the group B (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the HAMD score among the three groups before treatment (p > 0.05). The HAMD score in the group C was lower than that in the group A and the group B (p < 0.05), and the differences were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusions Combined use of group psychotherapy and drug has achieved remarkable success in the treatment of somatoform disorders, and can significantly improve patients'' mental health and clinical symptoms.
Keywords:group psychotherapy   somatoform disorders   intervention   efficacy
点击此处可从《中国现代医学杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国现代医学杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号