Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal artery using inflow-sensitive inversion recovery pulse sequence: A prospective comparison with enhanced CT angiography

Purpose

To prospectively evaluate the diagnostic value of non-enhanced inflow-sensitive inversion recovery (IFIR) MR angiography for the detection of renal artery stenosis (RAS), with enhanced CT angiography performed as the reference standard.

Materials and methods

Sixty consecutive patients suspected of RAS underwent both of IFIR MR and enhanced CT angiography. Subjective image quality, renal artery depiction and renal artery grading were all evaluated on artery-by-artery basis. Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to assess agreement between the two techniques. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for RAS detection at IFIR MR angiography were calculated.

Results

One hundred twenty-six main renal arteries were visualized on enhanced CT and non-enhanced MR angiographic images, respectively. The Spearman rank correlation was 0.773 (P < .001) for renal artery depiction, 0.998 (P < .001) for renal arteries grading and 0.833 (P < .001) for RAS detection between the two modalities. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of IFIR MR angiography for RAS detection demonstrated 100%, 99.0%, 92.0% and 100%, respectively.

Conclusion

Non-enhanced IFIR MR angiography had high sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV for RAS detection. It could be the first choice of renal artery imaging methods to avoid ionizing irradiation and renal toxicity from contrast media.