首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Viewpoint: Controversies Surrounding Use of Order Sets for Clinical Decision Support in Computerized Provider Order Entry
Authors:Anne M. Bobb  Thomas H. Payne  Peter A. Gross
Affiliation:aDepartment of Quality and Operations, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, IL;bDepartment of Information Technology Services, UW Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA;cDepartments of Internal Medicine, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, NJ;dUMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ
Abstract:
Order sets provide straightforward clinical decision support within computerized provider order entry systems. They make “the right thing” easier to do because they are much faster than writing single orders; they deliver real-time, evidence-based prompts; they are easy to update; and they support coverage of multiple patient problems through linkages among order sets. This viewpoint paper discusses controversies surrounding use of order sets—advantages and pitfalls, decision-making criteria, and organizational considerations, including suggestions for vendors. Order sets have the potential to improve clinician efficiency, provide real-time guidance, facilitate compliance with Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services performance measure sets, and encourage overall acceptance of computerized provider order entry, but may not do so unless these controversies are addressed.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号