首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial of sulindac in individuals at risk for melanoma
Authors:Clara Curiel‐Lewandrowski MD  Susan M. Swetter MD  Janine G. Einspahr PhD  Chiu‐Hsieh Hsu PhD  Ray Nagle MD  PhD  Paul Sagerman MD  Joseph Tangrea MPH  PhD  Howard Parnes MD  David S. Alberts MD  Hsiao‐Hui Chow PhD
Affiliation:1. College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, ArizonaFax: (520) 626‐6033;2. Department of Dermatology, Stanford University Medical Center and Cancer Institute;3. VA Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California;4. College of Medicine, Arizona Cancer Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona;5. Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona;6. Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
Abstract:

BACKGROUND:

Reduced melanoma risk has been reported with regular use of nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). However, the ability of NSAIDs to reach melanocytes in vivo and modulate key biomarkers in preneoplastic lesions such as atypical nevi has not been evaluated.

METHODS:

This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial of sulindac was conducted in individuals with atypical nevi (AN) to determine bioavailability of sulindac and metabolites in nevi and effect on apoptosis and vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA) expression in AN. Fifty subjects with AN ≥4 mm in size and 1 benign nevus (BN) were randomized to sulindac (150 mg twice a day) or placebo for 8 weeks. Two AN were randomized for baseline excision, and 2 AN and BN were excised after intervention.

RESULTS:

Postintervention sulindac, sulindac sulfone, and sulindac sulfide concentrations were 0.31 ± 0.36, 1.56 ± 1.35, and 2.25 ± 2.24 μg/mL in plasma, and 0.51 ± 1.05, 1.38 ± 2.86, and 0.12 ± 0.12 μg/g in BN, respectively. Sulindac intervention did not significantly change VEGFA expression but did increase expression of the apoptotic marker cleaved caspase‐3 in AN (increase of 3 ± 33 in sulindac vs decrease of 25 ± 45 in the placebo arm, P = .0056), although significance was attenuated (P = .1103) after adjusting for baseline expression.

CONCLUSIONS:

Eight weeks of sulindac intervention resulted in high concentrations of sulindac sulfone, a proapoptotic metabolite, in BN but did not effectively modulate VEGFA and cleaved caspase‐3 expression. Study limitations included limited exposure time to sulindac and the need to optimize a panel of biomarkers for NSAID intervention studies. Cancer 2012. © 2012 American Cancer Society.
Keywords:melanoma  prevention and control  chemoprevention  nevus  anti‐inflammatory agents  nonsteroidal  atypical nevi
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号