The organisation of critical care for burn patients in the UK: epidemiology and comparison of mortality prediction models |
| |
Authors: | A. P. Toft‐Petersen P. Ferrando‐Vivas D. A. Harrison K. Dunn K. M. Rowan |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Departments of Clinical Medicine and Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark;2. Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre (ICNARC), London, UK;3. Adult Burn Service, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester, UK |
| |
Abstract: | In the UK, a network of specialist centres has been set up to provide critical care for burn patients. However, some burn patients are admitted to general intensive care units. Little is known about the casemix of these patients and how it compares with patients in specialist burn centres. It is not known whether burn‐specific or generic risk prediction models perform better when applied to patients managed in intensive care units. We examined admissions for burns in the Case Mix Programme Database from April 2010 to March 2016. The casemix, activity and outcome in general and specialist burn intensive care units were compared and the fit of two burn‐specific risk prediction models (revised Baux and Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury models) and one generic model (Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre model) were compared. Patients in burn intensive care units had more extensive injuries compared with patients in general intensive care units (median (IQR [range]) burn surface area 16 (7–32 [0–98])% vs. 8 (1–18 [0–100])%, respectively) but in‐hospital mortality was similar (22.8% vs. 19.0%, respectively). The discrimination and calibration of the generic Intensive Care National Audit and Research Centre model was superior to the revised Baux and Belgian Outcome in Burn Injury burn‐specific models for patients managed on both specialist burn and general intensive care units. |
| |
Keywords: | burns critical care epidemiology hospital mortality models: statistical thermal injury |
|
|