首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

放射性125I粒子组织间植入或联合放化疗治疗复发直肠癌
引用本文:王俊杰,袁惠书,刘江平,姜伟娟,李金娜,姜玉良,田素青. 放射性125I粒子组织间植入或联合放化疗治疗复发直肠癌[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2005, 5(7): 522-524
作者姓名:王俊杰  袁惠书  刘江平  姜伟娟  李金娜  姜玉良  田素青
作者单位:北京大学第三医院肿瘤治疗中心,北京,100083
摘    要:目的探讨超声或CT引导下放射性125I粒子组织间植入治疗复发直肠癌的技术可行性、近期疗效和副反应.方法 15例直肠癌术后盆腔复发患者,女4例,男11例.硬膜外麻醉,2例经阴道超声引导,13例CT引导,行放射性125I粒子植入术.肿瘤匹配周边剂量为90~110 Gy,每颗粒子活度为0.50~0.70 mCi,植入33~70颗.术后24~48 h拍胸、盆腔X线片了解粒子是否发生移位.术后6例加三维适形放疗,4~6野/次,200~300 cGy/次,5次/周,总剂量为4 500~5 000 cGy,间隔4周.2例粒子治疗后加草酸铂、5-氟尿嘧啶和四氢叶酸化疗1个周期,随访3~15个月,根据CT扫描结果判断肿瘤大小. 结果术后平均7天疼痛缓解,其中12例完全缓解,2例部分缓解,1例无变化,有效率93%(14/15).9例肿瘤完全缓解,2例部分缓解,4例局部进展,局部控制率73%(11/15).2例术后6个月和12个月时死于肺转移.1例1颗粒子移位至盆壁,随访12个月无症状.无治疗相关并发症和副作用发生. 结论经超声或CT引导放射性125I粒子植入治疗复发直肠癌具有安全、微创、并发症发生率低和疗效肯定等优势,粒子治疗后应配合外放疗和全身化疗,有望进一步提高疗效.

关 键 词:125I粒子植入  复发直肠癌
文章编号:1009-6604(2005)07-0522-03
修稿时间:2004-12-13

125Iodine seed interstitial implantation combined with external radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy for recurrent rectal cancers
Wang Junjie,Yuan Huishu,Liu Jiangping,et al.. 125Iodine seed interstitial implantation combined with external radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy for recurrent rectal cancers[J]. Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2005, 5(7): 522-524
Authors:Wang Junjie  Yuan Huishu  Liu Jiangping  et al.
Affiliation:Wang Junjie,Yuan Huishu,Liu Jiangping,et al. Cancer Center,Peking University Third Hospital,Beijing 100083,China
Abstract:Objective To investigate the feasibility, short-term efficacy and adverse effects of 125 I seed implantation guided by ultrasonography or CT in the treatment of recurrent rectal cancers. Methods A total of 15 patients (4 women and 11 men) with recurrent rectal cancer entered the study. Uneer epidural anesthesia, the patients were treated with 125 I seed implantation under the guidance of either transvaginal ultrasonography or CT scans. The prescribed matched peripheral dose (MPD) was 90~110 Gy, with an activity per seed of 0.50~0.70 mCi and the total number of sources implanted of 33~70. Chest and pelvic X-ray examinations were performed within 24~48 hours after implantation to determine whether or not seed misplacement or migration existed. An additional three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy with a 4~6 fields technique was required in 6 patients 4 weeks postoperatively, with 200~300 cGy/fx, 5 fx/week, up to a total dose of 4500~5 000 cGy. Additional chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and tetrahydrofolic acid for one treatment course was given in 2 patients. The patients were followed for 3~15 months and the tumors were evaluated by CT findings. Results Relief from pain was achieved at a mean of 7 days after procedure, offering a complete relief in 12 patients, a partial relief in 2, and no change in 1, the effective rate being 93%(14/15). Nine patients showed a complete remission, 2 showed a partial remission, 4 showed a progressive disease, the local control rate being 73%(11/15). Two patients died of the dissemination to lungs. In 1 patient 1 seed had migrated to the pelvic side-wall and did not cause any clinical morbidity in a follow-up of 12 months. Conclusion 125 I implantation in recurrence of rectum cancer guided by ultrasonography or CT was safety, minimally invasion, low morbidity and high efficacy, it was worth of development and promotion.
Keywords:~(125) seed implantation  Recurrence of rectum carcinoma
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号