首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

胃食管反流病患者人格、社会支持及应对方式的研究
引用本文:阿地拉·,阿吉,邹韶红,热娜古丽·,艾买江,热衣拉·,克尤木,阿力甫·,吾甫尔. 胃食管反流病患者人格、社会支持及应对方式的研究[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2016, 3(3): 124-127. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.03.006
作者姓名:阿地拉·  阿吉  邹韶红  热娜古丽·  艾买江  热衣拉·  克尤木  阿力甫·  吾甫尔
作者单位:1. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院临床心理科2. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创研究所3. 830001 乌鲁木齐,新疆维吾尔自治区体育局体育训练一大队医务所
摘    要:
目的探讨胃食管反流病患者的人格、社会支持及应对方式,为其心理干预提供科学的理论依据。 方法回顾性分析2015年1月至2015年10月,新疆维吾尔自治区人民医院微创外科、耳鼻喉科、全科、干保科等科室收住的53例胃食管反流病患者(病例组)与同期在我院体检的52例健康人员(对照组)的一般资料,采用自制一般情况调查表、艾森克人格问卷EPQ、社会支持量表SSRS、简易应对方式问卷SCSQ进行调查,对胃食管反流病患者的人格、社会支持及应对方式进行评定分析。 结果病例组有效问卷48份(90%)。对照组有效问卷50份(96.1%)。病例组的EPQ中神经质或情绪稳定性(N)[(61.43±13.67)vs(50.40±10.20)]、内外向(E)[(64.12±4.06)vs(58.76±7.21)]高于对照组,SSRS中客观支持[(8.58±4.18)vs(11.72±2.91)]、社会支持利用度[(5.58±1.95)vs(8.52±1.66)]、总社会支持分[(36.79±8.97)vs(45.24±6,85)]均低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。 结论神经质及外向个性,低社会支持对胃食管反流病的发病有较大的,建议做好心理干预。

关 键 词:胃食管反流  人格  社会支持  应对方式  
收稿时间:2015-12-06

Study on the social support,coping style and personality characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients
Aji Adila,middot,Shaohong Zou,Aimaijiang Renaguli,middot,Keyimu Reyila,middot,Wufuer Alifu,middot. Study on the social support,coping style and personality characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Electronic Edition), 2016, 3(3): 124-127. DOI: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2016.03.006
Authors:Aji Adila·  Shaohong Zou  Aimaijiang Renaguli·  Keyimu Reyila·  Wufuer Alifu·
Affiliation:1. Department of Clinical Psychology, Xinjiang Provincial People Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China2. Department of Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Xinjiang Provincial People Hospital, Urumuqi 830001, China3. Department of the Clinic of Sports Bureau, Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumuqi 830001, China
Abstract:
ObjectiveTo explore the personality, social support and coping style of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients, and to provide scientific theoretical basis for it′s psychological intervention. MethodsUse to self-made general questionnaire, compared to eysenck personality questionnaire(EPQ), social support rating scale(SSRS), and simple coping style questionnaire(SCSQ)of 53 gastroesophageal reflux disease patients from minimally invasive surgery department, ent department, general department, cadre′s ward and other departments in the hospital of in the xinjiang uygur autonomous region people′s hospita from January 2015 to October 2015 and 52 Medical personnel as control group from xinjiang uygur autonomous region people′s hospita, then analyze the personalities, social support and coping style of gastroesophageal reflux disease patients. Results48 case of case group are valid, the effective rate is 90%.50 case of control group is valid, the effective rate is 96.1%.In the EPQ, neuroticism[(61.43±13.67)vs(50.40±10.20)]and Outgoing personality [(64.12±4.06)vs(58.76±7.21)]of the patients significantly highe than controls.Objective support [(8.58±4.18)vs(11.72±2.91)], utility [(5.58±1.95)vs(8.52±1.66)]and total social support score [(36.79±8.97)vs(45.24±6.85)]of the patients significantly lower than controls, (P<0.05). ConclusionThe neurotic personality, outgoing personality, insufficient social support have obvious relationship with GERD.
Keywords:Gastroesophageal reflux  Personality  Social support  Coping style  
点击此处可从《中华胃食管反流病电子杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华胃食管反流病电子杂志》下载全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号