首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

经皮扩张气管切开术临床应用研究
引用本文:于春刚,张燕,岳凤枢,吴凤娇.经皮扩张气管切开术临床应用研究[J].海南医学院学报,2009,15(8):915-916,919.
作者姓名:于春刚  张燕  岳凤枢  吴凤娇
作者单位:华北电网有限公司北京电力医院,北京丰台,100073
基金项目:海南医学院科研基金资助学报项目 
摘    要:目的:研究经皮扩张气管切开术与传统气管切开术2种方法的不同特点。方法:90例气管切开患者,根据手术方式的不同分为A、B两组,A组(48例)行经皮扩张气管切开术,B组(42例)行传统气管切开术,观察并比较两组患者手术时间、切口大小、术中出血量、术后并发症及切口愈合等情况。结果:与传统气管切开术相比,经皮扩张气管切开术操作时间短,切口小,术中出血少,术后并发症少,切口愈合快,感染率低(P〈0.05~0.01)。结论:经皮扩张气管切开术优于传统气管切开术。

关 键 词:经皮扩张气管切开术  传统气管切开术  临床应用

Clinical application of percutaneous dilated tracheostomy
YU Chun-gang,ZHANG Yan,YUE Feng-shu,WU Feng-jiao.Clinical application of percutaneous dilated tracheostomy[J].Journal of Hainan Medical College,2009,15(8):915-916,919.
Authors:YU Chun-gang  ZHANG Yan  YUE Feng-shu  WU Feng-jiao
Institution:( Beijing Electric Power Hospital, Beifing, 100073 )
Abstract:Objective:To study the characteristics of percutaneous dilated tracheostomy (PDT) and traditional tracheotomy. Methods:90 patients,who needed tracheotomy,were divide into two groups,group A (n=48) by PDT and group B (n=42) by traditional tracheotomy(TT). The operation time,incision size,bleeding volume,postoperative complications and incision healing were observed. Results:PDT was prefer to traditional tracheotomy in operation time,incision size,bleeding volume,complications,incision healing and low infection rate(P<0.05~0.01). Conclusions:PDT is better than traditional tracheotomy.
Keywords:PDT  Tracheotomy  Clinical application
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号